Skip to main content

Security report for kurepesa.ee

Valga Perekeskus Kurepesa · Non-profit · Estonia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Valga Perekeskus Kurepesa is a municipal social welfare institution in Estonia providing childcare and social services to children, youth, and families within the Valga municipality. The organization focuses on creating a safe and supportive environment tailored to individual needs, aiming to foster independent and socially responsible individuals. The website is built on WordPress with a moderate technical infrastructure, including jQuery and Foundation frameworks, and demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, though it lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally presented, reflecting its role as a public social service provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kurepesa.ee

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution operates as a small-sized non-profit entity under local government management, targeting families and children in need of social support services. Its business model revolves around public social welfare provision rather than commercial revenue generation. The website content and structure emphasize transparency and accessibility, with clear contact information and service descriptions. The absence of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its non-profit status. The organization maintains a consistent brand and trustworthy online presence, though it could benefit from enhanced digital maturity and security documentation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner with granular user controls, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in security management. The WordPress platform and plugins should be regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional best practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Consider adding a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data handling and retention practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Valga Perekeskus Kurepesa
Registration number
75026247
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Valga Perekeskus Kurepesa
Description
Valga Perekeskus Kurepesa is a social welfare institution managed by Valga municipality providing various social services to children, youth, and families with children. They emphasize dedication and expertise, offering a safe growth environment tailored to individual needs, aiming to help children become independent and full members of society.
Key services
Childcare services, Substitute care services, Aftercare services, Support person services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, PHP
Frameworks
Foundation (CSS/JS framework)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a municipal social service provider site in Estonia
  2. Content is in Estonian language
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed user controls
  5. No visible security headers detected
  6. No privacy or security policy pages explicitly found except basic documents
  7. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information present
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with jQuery and Foundation frameworks, providing a stable and familiar platform for content management. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile responsive, though accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is minimal but present through meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is standard for small non-profit organizations but could benefit from modernization and performance tuning to improve user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kurepesa.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kurepesa.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.