Skip to main content

Security report for kulturstiftung.li

Kulturstiftung Liechtenstein · Non-profit · Liechtenstein

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kulturstiftung Liechtenstein is a non-profit cultural foundation dedicated to supporting artists and cultural projects within Liechtenstein. The website serves as an informational platform detailing their funding programs, projects, and organizational structure. The foundation holds a key position in the cultural sector of Liechtenstein, targeting artists, cultural organizations, and the interested public. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a custom theme and uses legacy but stable JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.12.4 and Modernizr. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although security headers could be improved and incident response policies are not publicly documented. Privacy compliance is addressed with a privacy and cookie policy including consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained, reflecting the foundation's credibility and mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kulturstiftung.li

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit cultural sector, focusing on funding and promoting arts within Liechtenstein. Its business model revolves around grant-making and cultural project support rather than commercial revenue. The website's clear structure and content indicate a stable market position as a primary cultural funding entity in the region. The absence of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its non-profit status. The foundation maintains transparency through legal pages and structured navigation, although direct contact details are limited to a contact form, which may affect immediate accessibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly linked from the website. Growth indicators are not directly visible but the presence of multiple funding categories and project types suggests active engagement in the cultural community.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. The use of an outdated jQuery version could pose potential vulnerabilities if exploited. No explicit incident response or security policy documentation is available, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting compliance with GDPR. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting external reporting channels. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by updating libraries, adding security headers, and publishing incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Upgrade JavaScript libraries such as jQuery to the latest secure versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kulturstiftung Liechtenstein
Description
A cultural foundation committed to high quality standards in its own actions and in supporting artists and cultural creators.
Key services
Cultural funding, Own projects, Art space management, Cooperations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Modernizr 3.5.0, Respond 1.4.2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in German, targeting Liechtenstein cultural stakeholders.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact likely via contact form.
  4. No social media links detected in the provided HTML.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with custom theme 'kulturstiftung-liechtenstein'.
  6. Includes privacy and cookie policy pages with consent mechanism.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security/incident response policies found.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent plugin.
  9. Website is secure with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities.
  10. Design and navigation are professional and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme tailored for the foundation. It uses legacy JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.12.4 and Modernizr 3.5.0, which are functional but outdated. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain, indicating self-hosted resources. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No advanced frameworks or platforms beyond WordPress and standard JS libraries are detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kulturstiftung.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kulturstiftung.li.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.