Skip to main content

Security report for kufry-zavazadla.eu

KUZA - kufry a zavazadla · Retail · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KUZA - kufry a zavazadla operates an e-commerce website specializing in branded travel luggage, bags, and accessories targeting Czech and European customers. The business offers a variety of products including textile and plastic suitcases, business bags, backpacks, and travel accessories from well-known European brands. The website is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Security measures include CSRF token usage and HTTPS, but lack visible security headers and published privacy policies, indicating room for improvement in security posture and privacy compliance. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policies, which is typical for .eu domains, but this reduces transparency. Overall, the website is legitimate and functional with moderate trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kufry-zavazadla.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a niche retail market focused on travel luggage and accessories, serving a broad audience from casual travelers to professionals. The business model is e-commerce retail with a focus on quality and brand variety. The website content emphasizes well-known European brands and product warranties, which are trust signals. The absence of detailed company registration or contact information on the site limits business transparency. The use of Google Tag Manager suggests active marketing and analytics efforts. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security practices such as HTTPS and CSRF token usage. However, the absence of security headers like Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which is a gap in security readiness. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented but defaults to granted consent, which may not fully comply with GDPR best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Review cookie consent mechanism to ensure explicit user consent in compliance with GDPR.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KUZA - kufry a zavazadla
Description
Specialized retailer offering branded travel suitcases, bags, briefcases, and backpacks from well-known European and global manufacturers. The store targets a broad customer base from casual travelers to professionals, providing quality luggage and travel accessories.
Key services
Sale of travel suitcases (textile, plastic, aluminum), Travel bags and backpacks, Business bags and laptop briefcases, Outdoor and specialized luggage, Travel accessories and complementary products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap CSS, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of CSRF token in meta tag
  • Google Tag Manager with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and product listings.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to EURid privacy restrictions.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found on homepage HTML.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with default granted consent.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML.
  6. Use of Google Tag Manager indicates some level of analytics and marketing tracking.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. Website is in Czech language targeting Czech and European customers.
  10. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard tech stack including JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap CSS, and Font Awesome icons. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and preloads images for performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the HTML. The site appears to have moderate loading performance and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation menus. There is no evidence of modern frameworks like React or Angular. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy technical implementations could be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kufry-zavazadla.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kufry-zavazadla.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.