Skip to main content

Security report for ktsk-terminal.com

HOYER GmbH · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kombi Terminal Schkopau, operated under the HOYER GmbH brand, is a specialized logistics terminal focusing on container handling, hazardous goods storage, and rail transport connections. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear service descriptions targeting logistics and transport businesses. The technical infrastructure is based on TYPO3 CMS running on Apache with Debian, employing modern security headers and HTTPS protocols, though some security configurations like HSTS are not fully enabled. The site uses tracking and consent management tools indicating moderate privacy compliance. No critical security vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, but contact information is sparse on the main service page. Overall, the website reflects a medium-sized transportation business with a solid digital presence but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ktsk-terminal.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
43
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, providing container terminal services with a focus on hazardous materials and rail logistics. Its market position is supported by the HOYER GmbH parent brand, indicating a stable business model with national and international reach. The website's integration with partner domains and use of tracking tools suggests an established digital marketing and analytics approach. However, the absence of visible contact details and limited policy disclosures on the main page may impact user trust and lead generation. The business likely targets logistics companies and transport operators requiring specialized terminal services.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with TLS 1.2 and 1.3 support and implements a Content Security Policy restricting resource loading to trusted domains. Security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options and X-UA-Compatible are present. However, HSTS is declared in headers but not enabled in SSL configuration, and OCSP stapling is missing, which could affect certificate validation performance. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency. The use of third-party tracking and consent management tools is compliant but basic. Overall, the security posture is good but can be enhanced by enabling full HSTS, adding security.txt, and improving certificate management.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HSTS fully with includeSubDomains and preload to strengthen HTTPS enforcement.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking and performance.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection officer details.
  5. Enhance privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms with clearer user controls and disclosures.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on TYPO3 CMS with Apache on Debian, using compressed CSS and JavaScript assets for performance. The site is mobile responsive but with basic optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags and hreflang attributes for German and English. The Content Security Policy is comprehensive, restricting resource origins to trusted domains. Performance metrics indicate zero load time and resource count, likely due to incomplete data or measurement issues. The SSL configuration supports modern protocols but lacks detailed cipher suite information and OCSP stapling. Overall, the technical setup is stable but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ktsk-terminal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ktsk-terminal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.