Katholische Studierendengemeinde Greifswald (KSG Greifswald) is a small non-profit religious community serving students in Greifswald, Germany. The organization offers weekly religious services, communal meals, and events focused on spiritual, social, and academic topics. The website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and integrates event management via The Events Calendar plugin. The technical infrastructure is modern and adequate for the organization's needs, hosted on RZone servers. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers are missing and no explicit incident response or security policies are published. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-targeted to its audience.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
60
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention ksg-greifswald.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for ksg-greifswald.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
KSG Greifswald operates as a local religious student community with a clear focus on inclusivity and engagement through events and worship. Its market position is niche and community-focused, targeting students and young adults in Greifswald. The business model is non-commercial, relying on community participation and possibly church support. The website supports this with event listings and social media integration. There is no evidence of commercial activities or partnerships. Growth indicators include active event programming and social media presence. The organization maintains a consistent brand and messaging aligned with its mission.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information, which limits transparency. No tracking or advertising scripts reduce privacy risks. The site should improve cookie consent mechanisms to enhance GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but could benefit from standard hardening practices.
Recommendations
Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to improve security posture.
Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR requirements.
Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for abuse or security issues.
Enhance contact information visibility on the website to improve user trust and compliance.
Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Katholische Studierendengemeinde Greifswald
Description
Eine katholische Studierendengemeinde in Greifswald, die eine vielfältige Gruppe von Studierenden aller Fachrichtungen und Regionen vereint. Sie bieten wöchentliche Treffen mit Messe, Gebet, gemeinschaftlichem Essen und gesellschaftlichen, kirchlichen sowie wissenschaftlichen Themen an.
Key services
Wöchentliche Messe und Gebet, Gemeinsames Essen, Gesellschaftliche, kirchliche und wissenschaftliche Veranstaltungen, Veranstaltungsprogramm mit Vorträgen und Gottesdiensten
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Enfold Theme, The Events Calendar plugin
Frameworks
Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
Content is in German and targets local student community.
No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page.
Privacy policy and imprint pages exist and are linked in footer.
No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
Uses WordPress with Enfold theme and The Events Calendar plugin.
Social media presence on Instagram linked.
No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
No explicit security or incident response contact information.
No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a well-known CMS (WordPress) with a popular commercial theme (Enfold) and event management plugin (The Events Calendar). The tech stack includes jQuery and standard web technologies. Hosting is provided by RZone, a German hosting provider. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well. There is no evidence of heavy technical debt or outdated libraries. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is supported with proper meta tags and structured data. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking, which aligns with privacy-conscious design. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small community website.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with ksg-greifswald.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ksg-greifswald.de.