Skip to main content

Security report for krustabaznica.lv

RĪGAS KRUSTA EVAŅĢĒLISKI LUTERISKĀ DRAUDZE · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Krusta Draudze is a Latvian Lutheran church serving the local community with religious services, sermons, Bible studies, and various church-related activities. The website is built on WordPress and uses several common plugins for sliders and UI elements. The site targets Latvian-speaking individuals interested in Lutheran faith and community events. Technically, the site uses an older WordPress version and outdated jQuery library, which may expose it to security vulnerabilities. The site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance concern. Social media integration is present with official Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube channels. Overall, the site is functional and provides relevant content for its audience but requires technical and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching krustabaznica.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention krustabaznica.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for krustabaznica.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The church operates as a non-profit religious organization focused on community engagement and spiritual services. Its market position is local and community-centric, with no commercial business model. The website content is consistent with its mission and target audience. The absence of detailed business registration or WHOIS data limits deeper business intelligence. The social media presence supports outreach and community building. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website data.

Security posture

The website shows a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied but not confirmed. The absence of security headers and use of outdated software versions are notable vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policies are published. No signs of active security threats or malicious content were detected. The site would benefit from updating software, implementing security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  4. Verify and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and strong TLS configuration.
  5. Consider publishing incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RĪGAS KRUSTA EVAŅĢĒLISKI LUTERISKĀ DRAUDZE
Description
A Latvian Lutheran church community providing religious services, sermons, Bible studies, and community activities.
Key services
Religious services and worship, Sermons and spiritual teachings, Bible study groups, Sunday school, Community events and summer camps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Bootstrap, MediaElement.js, Owl Carousel, PrettyPhoto, MaxButtons plugin, MetaSlider plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS is implied by URLs but not confirmed in provided data
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site for a Latvian Lutheran church.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian language.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or linked menus.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  6. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in the HTML content.
  7. Use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions may pose security risks.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  10. Site uses multiple plugins for sliders, buttons, and galleries.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.1.19 with plugins including MetaSlider, MaxButtons, and PrettyPhoto. It uses jQuery 1.12.4, which is outdated and may have security issues. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources from its own domain and trusted external sources like Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with no evident optimization for speed beyond standard plugins. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The site lacks advanced technical configurations such as security headers or modern JavaScript frameworks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with krustabaznica.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review krustabaznica.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.