Skip to main content

Security report for kravasbusunoma.lv

Bus4rent.lv · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.kravasbusunoma.lv represents a Latvian cargo van rental business operating under the brand Bus4rent.lv. It offers a variety of cargo vans, refrigerated vans, passenger cargo buses, and trailers for short and long-term rental. The company positions itself as a professional and leading service provider in Latvia with over 14 years of experience, targeting local and international customers needing cargo transportation solutions. The website provides detailed service descriptions, pricing tables, and multiple contact channels including phone, email, and a contact form, supporting customer engagement and service inquiries. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform and uses Amazon CloudFront CDN for content delivery. It employs common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox, and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and includes a cookie consent banner, indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, no explicit privacy policy page was found, which is a compliance gap. Security headers are not detected in the provided data, suggesting opportunities for improving security hardening. From a security posture perspective, the site uses HTTPS and client-side form validation, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. The content is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable material detected. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and moderately secure but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices. Strategically, the business should prioritize publishing a comprehensive privacy policy, implementing security headers, and establishing incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance. Enhancing server-side validation and security monitoring would further strengthen the security posture. These steps will help maintain customer confidence and regulatory compliance while supporting business growth in the competitive cargo rental market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kravasbusunoma.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, specializing in cargo van and trailer rentals in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in a diverse fleet including vans with lifts, refrigerated vehicles, and passenger cargo buses, catering to various customer needs. The business model is rental-based with short and long-term options, targeting both local and international clients. Revenue streams are primarily from rental fees, with pricing clearly communicated on the website. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing customer engagement and marketing reach. The website content and contact details suggest a small-sized enterprise with a focused regional market. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company’s operational maturity is supported by over 14 years of experience, positioning it as a trusted service provider in Latvia’s cargo rental market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and client-side form validation is implemented to reduce input errors. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates potential exposure to common web vulnerabilities like clickjacking and content injection. No published security policy or incident response contact information is available, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The cookie consent banner shows awareness of privacy regulations, but the lack of a privacy policy page and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and best practices. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the website footer or main menu.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add server-side validation for all forms to complement client-side checks and prevent malicious input.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy with dedicated contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bus4rent.lv
Description
Profesionalākā kravas mikroautobusu īstermiņa un ilgtermiņa noma Latvijā. Piedāvā dažādu veidu kravas busus, kravas pasažieru busus, refrižeratorus un papildaprīkojumu nomai.
Key services
Kravas busu noma, Kravas busi ar liftu, Kravas pasažieru busu noma, Refrižeratoru noma, Treileru noma, Ilgtermiņa noma, Papildaprīkojums
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, MozLive API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Form validation on client side

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Cookiebar.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about cargo van rental services in Latvia.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  4. Contact information including phone, email, address, and contact form is clearly provided.
  5. No explicit privacy policy page found, which is a compliance gap.
  6. No visible security headers detected, suggesting room for security hardening.
  7. Uses Amazon CloudFront CDN and Mozello CMS platform.
  8. Includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  10. Pricing and service details are clearly presented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging Amazon CloudFront CDN for content delivery which supports performance and scalability. The technology stack includes jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3 for UI components, and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive with adaptive design elements and includes a cookie consent mechanism. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization techniques detected. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and labels present but no comprehensive accessibility framework. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags, canonical links, and structured navigation. The site lacks advanced security headers and server-side validation, representing technical debt and modernization opportunities. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kravasbusunoma.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kravasbusunoma.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.