Skip to main content

Security report for kralos.eu

KraLos GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KraLos GmbH is a German cybersecurity company specializing in developing automated solutions to detect and defend against digital threats such as phishing, web attacks, and data breaches. The company targets businesses of all sizes, with a focus on medium-sized enterprises and international customers. Their key offerings include WEBOUNCER for web application protection, PHISHING GUARD for email and message threat detection, SHADOWKEY for encrypted communications, and a Web Surface Scanner for vulnerability discovery. The website is professionally designed, leveraging WordPress and Elementor, and includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Instagram supports their brand visibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, KraLos presents a credible and trustworthy business with a solid technical foundation and good privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kralos.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
95
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kralos.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kralos.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KraLos positions itself as an innovative cybersecurity provider with award recognition, targeting a B2B market segment. Their business model revolves around delivering cybersecurity platforms that are easy to use yet technologically advanced, appealing to companies lacking deep technical expertise. The presence of testimonials and awards indicates a positive market reputation. The company operates primarily in the technology sector within Germany, with no indication of subsidiaries or parent companies. Their partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but external links to customer sites suggest active client relationships. The website content and structure support lead generation through demos and security checks, indicating a service-oriented revenue stream.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and GDPR cookie compliance implemented. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, which could improve transparency and incident handling. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries are detected in the HTML content. The absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts limits the ability to assess full compliance with standards like ISO 27001 or NIST. Overall, the security measures are adequate for a cybersecurity service provider's public website but could be enhanced with more detailed policy disclosures and dedicated security contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Add explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KraLos GmbH
Description
KraLos develops cybersecurity solutions that automatically detect and defend against digital attacks, focusing on ease of use and comprehensive protection for companies of all sizes.
Key services
WEBOUNCER - web application protection, PHISHING GUARD - detection of dangerous emails, texts, QR codes, SHADOWKEY - communication encryption, Web Surface Scanner - vulnerability discovery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, PHP (implied by WordPress), Inspiro theme, Elementor 3.32.4
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • GDPR cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear focus on cybersecurity solutions for businesses.
  3. GDPR compliance is implemented with cookie consent.
  4. Contact information is available via email and contact page.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. Use of WordPress with modern plugins and theme.
  7. Awards and testimonials enhance trustworthiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with the Inspiro theme and Elementor page builder, supported by several plugins for social icons, GDPR compliance, timelines, and scroll-to-top functionality. The tech stack is modern and widely supported, ensuring ease of maintenance and extensibility. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in lazy loading and caching strategies. Mobile optimization is good, providing a responsive user experience. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured content. No critical technical debt or risks are evident, but continuous monitoring of plugin updates and security patches is recommended to maintain stability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kralos.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kralos.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.