Skip to main content

Security report for kopiti.am

Kopiti.am · Technology · Singapore

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kopiti.am operates as a niche Mastodon instance providing a decentralized social networking platform primarily for Singaporean users. The platform leverages the open source Mastodon software (version 4.2.17) and offers features such as user profiles, content exploration, and community engagement. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and good content quality, targeting a small but active user base. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including React and FontAwesome, is hosted behind Cloudflare, and demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and script integrity checks, contributing to a solid security posture. However, the site lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms, terms of service, and explicit security or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the trustworthiness of the platform.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kopiti.am

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kopiti.am, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for kopiti.am.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kopiti.am positions itself as a community-focused decentralized social network for Singaporeans, leveraging Mastodon's federated model to provide an alternative to centralized social media platforms. Its business model centers on community engagement rather than commercial services, with no evident monetization or advertising partnerships. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its localized focus and open source foundation. Growth indicators include an active user count of 81 monthly active users and visible administrative oversight. The partnership with Mastodon and use of GitHub for source code transparency enhance credibility. However, the absence of detailed business contact information and formal policies limits its corporate transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled, comprehensive security headers, and use of integrity attributes on scripts and stylesheets. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and formal security policies indicates partial compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of published contacts or procedures. Overall, the platform maintains good baseline security but should enhance privacy compliance and incident response transparency to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  2. Publish clear terms of service and privacy policies detailing user rights and data handling practices.
  3. Develop and display a security policy including incident response contacts to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kopiti.am
Description
For Singaporeans by Singaporeans
Key services
Decentralized social networking, User profiles directory, Content exploration (posts, hashtags, news)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Mastodon 4.2.17, JavaScript, React, FontAwesome, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
Mastodon, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Integrity attributes on scripts and stylesheets
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce for styles

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Mastodon instance targeting Singaporean users
  2. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms visible
  4. No direct contact information or business registration details found
  5. Uses modern web technologies and open source Mastodon platform
  6. Security posture is good with HTTPS and security headers
  7. Limited business information beyond community focus
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Mastodon platform version 4.2.17, utilizing React for frontend rendering and FontAwesome for icons. It employs modern web standards with valid HTML and CSS, and includes integrity hashes for scripts and stylesheets to prevent tampering. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO meta tags and Open Graph data are present but limited. No CMS detected beyond Mastodon’s built-in system. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and well-maintained, with opportunities for enhancement in privacy and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kopiti.am. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kopiti.am.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.