4 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
3of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 10 issues across 2 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Security headers
15
GDPR outside view
83
Average
49
Not counted
SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
Email security: did not complete in this scan.
DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
Network security: did not complete in this scan.
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention kooperationen.dk, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for kooperationen.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Kooperationen operates as a membership-based non-profit organization focused on cooperative businesses in Denmark. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized advisory services in personnel law, construction law, cooperative legal aid, and accounting support. The organization also hosts events and training to engage members and stakeholders. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and service fees for courses and advisory. The target customers are cooperative enterprises and social economy organizations in Denmark. The organization maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, including cookie consent service providers and social media platforms. The website content and structure indicate a stable and established market presence with consistent branding and trust signals.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. The cookie consent banner complies with GDPR requirements, providing transparency and user control. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional best practices and explicit policies.
Recommendations
Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Enhance mobile optimization further to ensure excellent user experience across all devices.
Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Kooperationen
Description
Kooperationen is a Danish employer and interest organization for cooperative companies. It supports cooperative enterprises, social economy, construction, competence funds, parental leave schemes, and membership services.
Key services
Advisory services (personnel law, construction law, cooperative legal aid, accounting aid), Courses and training, Events and conferences, Membership management, Advocacy and policy responses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CookieInformation consent management
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Secure login form with POST method
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Ad networks
Google
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed categories
Clear contact information including physical address, phone, and email
No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Umbraco)
Good privacy compliance with GDPR-aligned cookie and privacy policies
Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram
No suspicious or malicious content detected
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with kooperationen.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kooperationen.dk.