Skip to main content

Security report for kondipak.lv

Kondipak · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kondipak.lv is an e-commerce retailer specializing in high-quality packaging solutions for confectionery products such as cakes, chocolates, and macarons. The company targets both home producers and commercial clients within Latvia, offering a variety of packaging types, sizes, and colors. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging modern web technologies and performance optimizations. It includes a cookie consent mechanism and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. However, explicit privacy and security policies are not found, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain legitimacy verification. The site demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kondipak.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kondipak.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kondipak.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kondipak operates in a niche retail sector focused on confectionery packaging within Latvia. Its business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce, supported by a catalog of diverse packaging products. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and provides customer support contact details. The absence of social media links and limited public business certifications suggest a small-sized enterprise with a localized market presence. The website's structured data and product offerings indicate a focus on quality and customer service, positioning Kondipak as a specialized supplier in its market segment.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent banner, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No security.txt or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency for vulnerability reporting. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and MonsterInsights introduces moderate tracking but no evident vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in headers, policy publication, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kondipak
Description
Kondipak.lv piedāvā augstas kvalitātes iepakojumu tortēm, konfektēm, šokolādes un citiem konditorejas izstrādājumiem. Piedāvā dažādu formu, krāsu un biezuma paliktņus un kastes, piemērotas gan mājražotājiem, gan komersantiem.
Key services
E-commerce sales of confectionery packaging, Product variety in packaging types and sizes, Customer support for packaging solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, LiteSpeed Cache, Google Analytics, jQuery, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce platform specializing in confectionery packaging.
  2. Content is in Latvian with language switcher for English and Russian.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed categories but no cookies listed.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. Contact information is present in structured data and visible on site.
  6. Uses WordPress with WooCommerce and standard plugins for performance and analytics.
  7. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress and WooCommerce, utilizing LiteSpeed Cache for performance optimization. It loads Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons, and jQuery for scripting. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking with event and pageview monitoring. The site is mobile responsive with a clear navigation structure and SEO-friendly metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and script loading. No hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kondipak.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kondipak.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.