Skip to main content

Security report for konabo.cz

Komunitní nadace Blanicko – Otavská · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Komunitní nadace Blanicko – Otavská is a Czech community foundation dedicated to supporting local projects that benefit residents and foster regional development. The foundation operates primarily in the Blanicko – Otavská region, providing grants and managing donor funds to support social services, environment, culture, education, and local development. The website reflects a small but established non-profit organization with a clear mission and local focus. Technically, the site is built on the Webnode CMS platform, uses HTTPS with Cloudfront CDN for asset delivery, and implements a cookie consent mechanism, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data and lack of published privacy and terms policies represent gaps in transparency and compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS but could be improved by adding security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in content but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching konabo.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a niche position as a regional community foundation with over 20 years of history, focusing on grant-making and community development in specific Czech regions. Its business model is non-profit, relying on fundraising and donor collaboration. The organization has demonstrated growth and professionalization over time, including membership in the Asociace komunitních nadací. The website content and contact information support its legitimacy and local engagement. The foundation's partnerships with municipalities and local organizations strengthen its ecosystem. Revenue streams are primarily grants and donations. The foundation targets local non-profits and community projects, indicating a focused customer segment. Growth indicators include historical grant distribution and ongoing community programs. Strategic observations suggest the foundation could improve digital transparency and security to enhance stakeholder trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, uses a CDN for content delivery, and includes a cookie consent banner, reflecting basic security hygiene. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits the organization's ability to manage security incidents proactively. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The site lacks a published privacy policy, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response contact channels are not provided. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and domain legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and discoverability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Komunitní nadace Blanicko – Otavská
Registration number
65986920
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Komunitní nadace Blanicko – Otavská
Description
Komunitní nadace Blanicko – Otavská is a community foundation supporting projects that benefit local residents and contribute to regional development. It is open to a broad spectrum of local issues including regional development, social and health services, environment, culture and arts, education, and human resources. The foundation raises financial resources and creates cooperation space among non-governmental, business, and public sectors, primarily providing grants to non-profit organizations.
Key services
Grant provision, Fundraising, Community development support, Donor fund management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cloudfront CDN, Webnode CMS
Platforms
Webnode website builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudfront CDN for hosting assets.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with options for necessary and all cookies.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. Contact information including email, phone, and physical addresses are clearly presented.
  7. Website is built on Webnode CMS platform.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. No social media links detected on the site.
  10. Content is focused on community foundation activities and is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webnode CMS platform, leveraging HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with assets served via Amazon Cloudfront CDN. The site is mobile responsive and includes a cookie consent mechanism. Performance is moderate, with no major errors or broken elements detected. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The absence of security headers and WHOIS data represents technical debt and potential risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small non-profit but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with konabo.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review konabo.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.