Skip to main content

Security report for komunitninadace.cz

Ústecká komunitní nadace · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ústecká komunitní nadace is a well-established non-profit community foundation based in Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic, with roots dating back to 1993. The organization focuses on supporting local community projects through grants and donations, aiming to improve the quality of life in the Ústecký region. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, providing clear information about their mission, donors, and supported projects. The foundation maintains active partnerships with reputable organizations and has a visible presence on major social media platforms. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor framework, incorporating modern web technologies such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and lazy loading for images. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration but lacks several recommended security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear GDPR and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms. However, the site does not publish explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be areas for future enhancement. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and credible image for a non-profit organization, with a solid technical foundation and good privacy practices. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility would further strengthen their digital maturity and risk posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching komunitninadace.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ústecká komunitní nadace occupies a unique market position as the first Czech community foundation and the second oldest in Central and Eastern Europe. Their business model revolves around managing donor funds and distributing grants to local non-profit projects, focusing on community development in the Ústecký region. Revenue streams primarily come from donations and fund management fees. The foundation targets local non-profits, community groups, and socially engaged individuals. Their partnership ecosystem includes prominent regional companies and institutions, enhancing their credibility and reach. Growth indicators include expanding grant programs and multi-year funding initiatives. The website content and partner affiliations suggest a stable and reputable operation with strong community ties.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection indicates room for improvement. No known vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, reflecting good compliance practices. The lack of published incident response procedures or security contact channels suggests limited transparency in security governance. Implementing a security.txt file and enhancing header configurations would improve incident readiness and overall security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contacts on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Optimize website performance by improving loading speed and reducing technical debt in scripts and styles.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ústecká komunitní nadace
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ústecká komunitní nadace
Description
Podporujeme nadšení a snahu těch, kteří nestojí s rukama za zády. Proto každoročně podpoříme desítky projektů, za kterými stojí úsilí stovek místních lidí.
Key services
Grant funding for local projects, Community support and development, Fund management for donors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, LazySizes
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data
  2. No WHOIS data available, likely privacy protected
  3. Uses modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress + Elementor)
  4. Has clear contact info and social media presence
  5. Includes privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance
  6. No visible security headers detected, improvement opportunity
  7. No terms of service page found
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. It integrates common analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for user tracking and campaign measurement. The use of lazy loading for images improves perceived performance. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and some accessibility best practices. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's digital presence effectively but could benefit from security and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with komunitninadace.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review komunitninadace.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.