Skip to main content

Security report for knightfrank.com.tw

瑞普萊坊 · Real Estate · Taiwan

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

瑞普萊坊是台灣領先的不動產仲介及顧問公司，隸屬於全球知名的Knight Frank集團，擁有超過五十年的本地經驗及全球512家辦事處的支持。網站提供多元化的商業物業服務，包括辦公室、零售、工業及飯店等，並強調專業的投資及估價顧問服務。技術上，網站基於ASP.NET平台，採用Google reCAPTCHA保護聯絡表單，並整合TagCommander進行追蹤管理，整體性能及移動端優化良好。安全方面，網站使用HTTPS並具備基本安全標頭，無明顯漏洞，但缺乏公開的安全政策及事件響應資訊。整體風險較低，建議加強隱私合規及安全透明度以提升信任度。

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching knightfrank.com.tw

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

瑞普萊坊作為Knight Frank集團在台灣的重要分支，定位於高端商業不動產市場，目標客戶涵蓋投資者、企業及業主。其競爭優勢在於結合全球資源與本地專業，並持續推廣美國CCIM及CRE認證的不動產分析方法。網站內容專業且品牌一致，通過多渠道（包括社交媒體及招聘平台）擴展市場影響力。業務模式以仲介及顧問服務為核心，並輔以估價及投資策略諮詢。未見直接營收數據，但品牌及服務範圍顯示中大型企業規模。

Security posture

網站安全措施包括HTTPS加密連接及Google reCAPTCHA防止機器人濫用，表單有基本驗證機制。安全標頭存在但未全面披露，缺少安全政策及事件響應聯絡資訊，無安全.txt文件。無明顯漏洞或敏感資料外洩跡象，整體安全成熟度中等偏上。建議完善安全政策公開，增強用戶信任及合規性。

Recommendations

  1. 實施明確的Cookie同意機制以符合隱私法規要求。
  2. 發布完整的安全政策及事件響應流程，提升透明度。
  3. 建立並公開安全.txt文件，方便漏洞報告及溝通。
  4. 加強網站無障礙設計，提升可訪問性。
  5. 持續監控並更新第三方庫及追蹤工具，防止潛在漏洞。
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
瑞普萊坊
Description
瑞普萊坊為台灣領先的不動產仲介及顧問公司之一。憑藉全球512家辦事處網絡及美國不動產投資師協會（CCIM Institute）和不動產諮商師協會（CRE）認可的不動產分析法，為投資者、企業和業主提供優質不動產服務和市場建議。
Key services
辦公室租售, 零售物業, 工業不動產, 飯店及服務式住宅, 投資服務, 估價及顧問
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET Web Forms, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, TagCommander, jQuery
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 invisible used on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form validation with client-side and server-side checks

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TagCommander
Marketing tools
TagCommander
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Traditional Chinese.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. Uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration.
  4. Includes Google reCAPTCHA for form security.
  5. No explicit phone numbers or emails publicly listed; contact via form only.
  6. Strong branding consistent with Knight Frank global network.
  7. Multiple external links to Knight Frank global sites and social media.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  10. Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is absent.
Technical notes

Notes

網站基於ASP.NET Web Forms架構，使用Google reCAPTCHA及TagCommander進行安全及追蹤管理。前端資源合理預載字體及樣式，支持多語言及移動端響應。SEO優化良好，包含meta描述及Open Graph標籤。性能屬於中等，無明顯技術債務。建議持續更新技術棧，並優化無障礙及性能指標。
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with knightfrank.com.tw. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review knightfrank.com.tw.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.