Security report for klubsvobodnychmatek.cz
Klub svobodných matek z.s · Non-profit · Czech Republic
Klub svobodných matek z.s is a Czech non-profit organization dedicated to supporting single-parent families across the Czech Republic. The organization provides financial, material, legal, and informational assistance to help single parents and their children manage daily challenges. Their services include aid for food, housing costs, school supplies, summer camps, and clothing through their Oděvní banka program. They also offer a free helpline and legal online advice. The website reflects a well-established entity with a clear mission and consistent branding, supported by testimonials and active social media channels. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, incorporating modern web technologies such as jQuery and Swiper.js. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. The hosting and domain registration are consistent with a Czech-based non-profit organization, with no suspicious indicators. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies such as incident response or vulnerability disclosure. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms, which is a notable compliance gap. Tracking is implemented via Leadhub pixels, indicating moderate user tracking. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy for its intended audience but should enhance privacy compliance and security best practices to improve its security posture and regulatory adherence.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 outside view
- Not assessed
- GDPR outside view
- Not assessed
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
- CWE-327
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V12.1.1
- RFC 8996
- RFC 7568
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: tls_versions TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8(1): NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8(1): Cryptographic Protection
- High
Network security
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
- High
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
- NIS2 21(2)(e)
- IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
- NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
- NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching klubsvobodnychmatek.cz
This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 62
- Email security
- 65
- DNS health
- 85
- Network security
- 20
- Average
- 58
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
- Add security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
- Establish and disclose an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and readiness.
- Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
- Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Klub svobodných matek z.s
- Description
- Klub svobodných matek se zaměřuje na podporu rodičů, kteří zůstali na výchovu dětí sami. Nabízí finanční, materiální, právní, odbornou a informační pomoc samoživitelům a jejich dětem po celé České republice. Pomáhají s financemi na potraviny, náklady na bydlení, letní tábory, školní pomůcky a vánoční dárky. Poskytují také materiální pomoc v podobě oblečení a bezplatnou infolinku a právní online poradnu.
- Key services
- finanční pomoc, materiální pomoc, právní poradenství, informační podpora, bezplatná infolinka, právní online poradna, oděvní banka, charitativní obchod
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- WordPress, Elementor, Astra Theme, jQuery, Font Awesome, Swiper.js
- Frameworks
- WordPress
- Platforms
- Web
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- basic
- SEO
- basic
Security
- Observed score
- 70/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enabled
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Leadhub
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- poor
Advertising
- Tracking pixels
- Leadhub (lhinsights.com)
- Marketing tools
- Leadhub tracking
- Transparency
- basic
Site quality
- Design
- good
- User experience
- good
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- good
- Professionalism
- good
- Trustworthiness
- moderate
Key observations
- Website is a professionally designed non-profit site supporting single-parent families in Czechia.
- No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
- Contact phone number is prominently displayed with clear context.
- Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn is active and linked.
- Use of modern WordPress technologies and plugins indicates reasonable technical maturity.
- Tracking pixel from Leadhub is present, but no major ad networks detected.
- No security headers detected in the HTML content; potential area for improvement.
- No visible forms on the homepage, but buttons link to support request pages likely containing forms.
- No evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies.
- Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with klubsvobodnychmatek.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review klubsvobodnychmatek.cz.