Skip to main content

Security report for kloster-schwarzenberg.de

Kloster Schwarzenberg · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kloster Schwarzenberg is a small, non-profit religious community of Franciscan Minorites located in Scheinfeld, Germany. The website serves as a spiritual and informational hub offering details about their community, spiritual services, guest accommodations, and educational programs. The site targets individuals seeking spiritual guidance, pilgrims, and guests interested in retreats and religious education. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the GeneratePress theme and includes modern web technologies such as jQuery and Yoast SEO. Hosting appears to be managed via kasserver.com. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes essential privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though security headers and explicit security policies are absent. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kloster-schwarzenberg.de

This scan found 34 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
50
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
43
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Kloster Schwarzenberg as a niche religious institution with a long historical background dating back to the early 17th century. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on spiritual services, community engagement, and hosting guests for retreats and educational events. The target market includes local and regional religious communities and visitors interested in spiritual growth. The organization maintains a clear and consistent brand presence online, with trust signals such as privacy policies and contact transparency. There is no evidence of commercial partnerships or subsidiaries. The site’s content and structure support its mission effectively, though there is room for enhanced digital marketing and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, and a cookie consent mechanism is in place, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no advanced security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) were detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site uses common WordPress plugins and themes, which should be regularly audited to mitigate risks. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which could be improved to enhance security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and stakeholders.
  3. Regularly update and audit WordPress core, themes, and plugins to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding social media presence and marketing tools to increase outreach and engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kloster Schwarzenberg
Description
Kloster Schwarzenberg is a Franciscan Minorite spiritual community located in Scheinfeld, Germany. They provide spiritual support, pastoral services, and host guests for retreats, pilgrimages, and educational programs.
Key services
Spiritual guidance and pastoral care, Pilgrimage and worship services, Guesthouse accommodations and educational programs, Community events and study trips
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, GeneratePress theme, Yoast SEO, Koko Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Koko Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Koko Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is well-structured and relevant to the religious community and visitors.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address.
  6. Technical stack is modern and based on WordPress with common plugins and themes.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. No forms with personal data collection detected on the homepage content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with the GeneratePress theme and Yoast SEO plugin for search optimization. It uses jQuery and custom scripts for UI and analytics (Koko Analytics). The hosting provider is inferred from the nameservers as kasserver.com, a known hosting service. Performance is moderate with caching and optimization plugins in use (Autoptimize). The site is mobile responsive and includes basic accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or headless CMS architectures. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and lack of advanced security headers. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small non-profit organization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kloster-schwarzenberg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kloster-schwarzenberg.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.