Skip to main content

Security report for klimavolksbegehren.at

Klimavolksbegehren · Non-profit · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Klimavolksbegehren is a grassroots climate advocacy organization based in Austria, focused on mobilizing volunteers and the public to support bold climate policies. The website serves as a platform for information dissemination, event organization, and community engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with privacy-conscious analytics via Matomo and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though formal security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, serving its non-profit mission effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching klimavolksbegehren.at

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
60
Average
55
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention klimavolksbegehren.at, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
71
Employees
5
Customers
56
Third parties
10
Weak passwords
1%

Latest record dated 2026-05-21 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for klimavolksbegehren.at.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –crm.klimavolksbegehren.at2026-05-21
  • –klimavolksbegehren.at2025-11-04
  • –crm.klimavolksbegehren.at2025-09-20
  • –crm.klimavolksbegehren.at2025-09-20
  • –crm.klimavolksbegehren.at2025-09-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a key player in Austria's climate activism landscape, leveraging volunteer networks and public workshops to influence policy. Its business model is non-profit advocacy, targeting environmentally conscious citizens and stakeholders. The website's integration with marketing tools like Facebook Pixel and Ortto indicates efforts to expand reach and engagement. The transparent WHOIS data and consistent branding reinforce credibility. Growth potential lies in expanding digital engagement and formalizing security and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, standard security headers, and privacy-respecting analytics. The cookie consent implementation is robust, offering granular user control. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents gaps in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Enhancing these areas would improve trust and compliance, especially under evolving regulations like NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and marketing tools for security and privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Klimavolksbegehren
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Klimavolksbegehren
Description
Klimavolksbegehren is a grassroots climate initiative driven by volunteers advocating for bold climate policies in Austria. It organizes workshops, collects ideas for a better everyday life, and engages the public in climate action.
Key services
Climate policy advocacy, Workshops and public forums, Information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Matomo Analytics, Real Cookie Banner Pro, Vimeo embed
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of Matomo with disabled cookies for privacy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Ortto, Instantfox
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based climate advocacy platform with good privacy compliance.
  2. Uses Matomo analytics with cookies disabled for privacy.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with granular controls.
  4. No security.txt or explicit security policy page found.
  5. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  6. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the website's purpose.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. External scripts include marketing and tracking tools such as Facebook Pixel and Ortto.
  9. Performance is moderate with caching and minified assets.
  10. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor for design and Yoast SEO for optimization. It employs Matomo analytics configured to disable cookies, enhancing privacy compliance. Real Cookie Banner Pro manages consent with detailed service categorization. Hosting is via easyname GmbH, a reputable Austrian provider. Performance is moderate with caching and minified assets, and mobile optimization is good. The site could benefit from improved accessibility and further technical hardening, including security policy automation and monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with klimavolksbegehren.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review klimavolksbegehren.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.