Skip to main content

Security report for kjg-berlin.de

KjG Berlin · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KjG Berlin is a small non-profit Catholic youth organization based in Germany, focused on engaging young people in community activities, education, and events within the Catholic framework. The website serves as an informational and organizational platform for members and interested parties, providing updates, event information, and contact details primarily via email. The organization maintains a presence on social media platforms such as Instagram and Facebook to reach its target audience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, utilizing standard web technologies such as PHP, JavaScript, and CSS. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communication. While the site demonstrates good mobile optimization and basic SEO practices, it lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for GDPR compliance and enhanced security. From a security perspective, the site shows a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled but missing several security headers and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy present, but the absence of a cookie consent banner is a gap. Overall, KjG Berlin presents a trustworthy and professional online presence for a small non-profit organization. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and incident response documentation would enhance compliance and security posture, supporting the organization's credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kjg-berlin.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KjG Berlin operates as a local non-profit youth organization within the Catholic community in Berlin, targeting youth and young adults interested in faith-based community engagement. The organization’s business model revolves around community service, event organization, and educational workshops. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and donations, though not explicitly stated. The website content and structure indicate a focus on transparency and community involvement, with active social media channels to engage members. The organization appears well-positioned within its niche, with consistent branding and clear communication channels. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content or WHOIS data.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted data transmission. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism may pose GDPR compliance risks. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but can be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide a dedicated security contact email to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KjG Berlin
Description
KjG Berlin is a Catholic youth organization in Berlin focused on youth engagement, education, and community activities. They organize events, workshops, and provide support for youth groups within the Catholic community.
Key services
Organization of youth events and workshops, Support and consultation for youth groups, Educational programs and training, Membership management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, CSS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit youth organization site.
  2. Content is in German and focused on Catholic youth activities in Berlin.
  3. Contact is primarily via email; no phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  5. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook is linked.
  7. No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) explicitly found in the HTML head.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, a widely used CMS, indicating ease of content management and extensibility. The use of standard web technologies (PHP, JavaScript, CSS) is evident. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices, providing a good user experience across platforms. SEO practices are basic but present, including meta tags and structured navigation. However, the absence of advanced SEO structured data (JSON-LD, Open Graph) limits rich search engine results. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. The site could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced accessibility features to improve overall technical quality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kjg-berlin.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kjg-berlin.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.