Skip to main content

Security report for kjaergroup.com

Kjaer group a/s · Automotive · Australia

Partial score · DNS & email only

58/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kjaergroup.com

This scan found 13 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Average
58

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the blocking mechanism, no business intelligence data such as company description, market position, or services can be extracted. The domain's age and registrar information indicate a potentially established entity, but no corroborating content or contact details are present to validate business operations or partnerships. No social media or external business links were found, limiting insights into the company's ecosystem or customer engagement.

Security posture

The security posture is partially obscured by the WAF challenge. The site employs a custom JavaScript proof-of-work CAPTCHA to mitigate automated access, which is a strong anti-bot measure. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and visible HTTPS enforcement details are weaknesses. No privacy or incident response policies are published, and no contact channels for security incidents are provided. Overall, the security maturity appears limited to perimeter defense without transparency or compliance indicators.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and expose clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  2. Publish contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen domain and web security.
  4. Provide HTTPS enforcement details and ensure SSL/TLS configurations are robust and visible.
  5. Reduce reliance on blocking mechanisms for legitimate users by implementing user-friendly CAPTCHA or alternative bot mitigation.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page is a JavaScript-based robot challenge screen with proof-of-work CAPTCHA, indicating a WAF or security challenge blocking direct access to content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Web Workers, SHA1 Crypto, Base64 Encoding
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of JavaScript-based proof-of-work CAPTCHA challenge

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a JavaScript-based robot challenge requiring proof-of-work CAPTCHA.
  2. No visible business or contact information on the landing page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or data collection fields detected.
  5. No social media or external business-related links found.
  6. Technical implementation focuses on anti-bot measures rather than content delivery.
  7. WHOIS data shows a long-registered domain with custom name servers but no DNSSEC.
  8. No security headers or HTTPS details available from provided data.
  9. Page instructs users to enable cookies but does not provide cookie consent mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kjaergroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kjaergroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

kjaergroup.com security report (partial scan) | Guard