Skip to main content

Security report for kidslovesport.org

Gymnathlon Foundation · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gymnathlon Foundation is a Czech non-profit organization dedicated to providing sports scholarships and organizing sports activities for disadvantaged children, particularly those from single-parent and low-income families. The website is professionally designed using the Framer platform and incorporates modern analytics and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service policies, as well as the lack of contact information, limits transparency and user trust. The security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and vulnerability disclosure policies. The WHOIS data shows an unusual future domain creation date, which may be a data error but slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional and serves its non-profit mission but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security documentation.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kidslovesport.org

This scan found 13 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Email security
77
DNS health
70
Network security
100
Average
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Gymnathlon Foundation operates in the non-profit sector focused on social inclusion through sports for children in need. Its business model revolves around providing scholarships and organizing sports clubs in children's homes, targeting disadvantaged youth in the Czech Republic. The organization appears small in size with a niche market position. The website's use of analytics and cookie consent tools suggests an awareness of digital marketing and compliance requirements, though key legal documents are missing. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The foundation's operations are likely funded through donations or grants, typical for non-profits. The lack of detailed business information and contact data limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, which is positive for user privacy and security. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, indicating limited incident response readiness. The WHOIS data anomaly regarding the domain creation date is a minor concern but does not directly impact security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Add clear contact information including official emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gymnathlon Foundation
Description
Poskytujeme sportovní stipendia pro děti samoživitelů a nízkopříjmové rodiny. Pořádáme sportovní kroužky v dětských domovech.
Key services
sports scholarships, sports clubs in children's homes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (website generator), Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page or metadata
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. Website uses modern tracking and analytics tools
  6. WHOIS data contains an anomalous future creation date
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected
  8. Content is focused on non-profit sports scholarships for disadvantaged children in Czech Republic
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer platform, leveraging modern web technologies and integrating Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. Hosting is managed by Gransy, s.r.o., a Czech registrar and hosting provider. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security best practices. The domain WHOIS data contains an anomalous future creation date, which should be verified and corrected if possible. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's mission but has room for improvement in security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kidslovesport.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kidslovesport.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.