Skip to main content

Security report for khl.org.uk

Keighley Healthy Living · Non-profit · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Keighley Healthy Living (KHL) is a UK-based non-profit charity dedicated to improving community health and wellbeing in the Keighley area. The organization offers a variety of services including social groups, exercise programs, support groups, skills development, and nutrition initiatives. Their business model focuses on community engagement through volunteering, donations, and partnerships, positioning themselves as a key local health and wellbeing resource. The website reflects a professional and community-focused presence with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to their audience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and several plugins that enhance accessibility, event management, and GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and includes multilingual support via Google Translate. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and technical optimizations. The use of HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms demonstrates a commitment to user privacy and security. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses a reputable donation platform, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS lookup failed due to an invalid query format, but the domain appears legitimate based on website content and SSL configuration. Overall, KHL's website is a trustworthy and well-maintained platform supporting their charitable mission. Strategic improvements in security headers, vulnerability disclosure, and incident response documentation would enhance their security posture and trustworthiness further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching khl.org.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KHL operates as a small non-profit charity focused on community health in West Yorkshire, UK. Their competitive advantage lies in localized services tailored to physical and mental wellbeing, supported by community involvement and partnerships such as the Give a Little donation platform. Revenue streams likely include donations, grants, and fundraising activities. The target customer segment is the local community, including individuals seeking health support and social engagement. Growth indicators include active social media presence and diverse project offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes trusted third-party platforms for donations and event management. The organization demonstrates a clear mission with consistent branding and community trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, indicating compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, and the use of reputable third-party services for donations reduces risk. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query issues, which slightly impacts trust but is mitigated by the professional website presence. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but could be improved with enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated or vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance website performance and accessibility through optimization techniques and continuous monitoring.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
04190566
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Keighley Healthy Living
Description
KHL is a Keighley-based charity focused on improving community health and wellbeing by providing inclusive opportunities for physical and mental development.
Key services
Social groups, Exercise activities, Support groups, Skills development, Nutrition and food programs, Room booking, Volunteering and donation opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Translate, Accessible Poetry plugin, Divi Mega Pro plugin, Modern Events Calendar plugin, Complianz GDPR plugin, Popups for Divi plugin
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a community health charity with clear mission and services.
  2. Content is well structured with accessible navigation and multilingual support via Google Translate.
  3. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content.
  4. Donation processing uses a reputable third-party platform (Give a Little).
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query error; domain legitimacy inferred from website content and SSL.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme and multiple plugins that provide accessibility, event management, GDPR compliance, and popup functionality. The tech stack includes jQuery and Google Fonts, with multilingual support via Google Translate. The site is mobile-optimized and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and technical SEO. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communications. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small non-profit but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with khl.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review khl.org.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.