Milieu Centraal operates the Keurmerkenwijzer platform, a trusted Dutch informational resource that educates consumers about sustainability labels across various product categories. The platform provides detailed evaluations of environmental, animal welfare, and social criteria to help consumers make informed sustainable choices. The website is well-positioned in the Dutch market as an authoritative non-profit source with a clear focus on transparency and consumer guidance. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on Microsoft Azure, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not published. Privacy compliance is good, with a cookie consent mechanism in place and a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
70
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention keurmerkenwijzer.nl, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for keurmerkenwijzer.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The platform targets environmentally conscious Dutch consumers seeking clarity on sustainability labels. Its business model is informational and non-profit, focusing on education rather than commercial transactions. The site benefits from partnerships with related informational sites under the Milieu Centraal umbrella, enhancing its reach and credibility. The content is rich and well-maintained, supporting a strong market position as a go-to resource for sustainability label information. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for contact via web forms or social media channels. The platform's integration with Google Analytics and Tag Manager supports data-driven insights while maintaining privacy compliance through Cookiefirst consent management.
Security posture
The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure form implementations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism represents an area for improvement. The site does not expose any critical security issues or vulnerabilities, and its use of modern frameworks and hosting on Azure contributes to a robust security foundation. Privacy compliance is well-handled with cookie consent and a detailed privacy policy, aligning with GDPR requirements.
Recommendations
Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
Provide explicit incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Enhance transparency on data retention policies related to analytics and user data.
Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Milieu Centraal
Description
Milieu Centraal provides a comprehensive overview of sustainability labels (keurmerken) to help consumers make informed choices about environmental impact, animal welfare, and social conditions related to products.
Key services
Sustainability label explanations, Comparative scoring of labels, Searchable database of labels by category, Consumer guidance on sustainable choices
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
React, Next.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiefirst Consent Management
Frameworks
Next.js, Material UI
Platforms
Azure Web Apps
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Use of CSP
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Secure forms with autocomplete off
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Marketing tools
Cookiefirst Consent Management
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
Content is comprehensive and well-structured for the target audience.
Strong focus on sustainability and consumer education.
Use of modern web technologies and good security practices.
Social media presence is active and linked in footer.
No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact likely via web form or social media.
Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiefirst.
No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built using a modern React and Next.js stack, leveraging Material UI for UI components. It is hosted on Microsoft Azure, ensuring scalability and reliability. Performance is optimized with fast loading times and mobile responsiveness. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. Accessibility features are present, including skip links and ARIA labels. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics, integrated with Cookiefirst for cookie consent management. No technical debt or legacy technologies were detected, indicating a well-maintained and modern infrastructure.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with keurmerkenwijzer.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review keurmerkenwijzer.nl.