Skip to main content

Security report for keringeyewear.com

Kering Eyewear S.p.A. · Retail · Italy

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kering Eyewear S.p.A. is a prominent luxury eyewear company operating under the global Kering Group umbrella. Established in 2014 and headquartered in Italy, it designs, develops, and distributes eyewear for a portfolio of 14 prestigious brands, including proprietary and licensed luxury houses. The company positions itself as a market leader in the luxury eyewear segment, targeting discerning consumers and industry partners. The website reflects a high level of professionalism with rich multimedia content, clear navigation, and consistent branding across multiple languages and regions. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and OneTrust for cookie consent, hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS implementation is a critical security gap that undermines user trust and data protection. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented, indicating good GDPR compliance. Contact information is available, though no phone numbers are explicitly provided. Overall, the site demonstrates strong business credibility but requires urgent security improvements to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching keringeyewear.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kering Eyewear operates in the luxury retail sector with a unique business model focused on eyewear design and distribution for both proprietary and licensed brands. Its competitive advantage lies in its association with the Kering Group and a diversified brand portfolio including LINDBERG, Maui Jim, Gucci, Cartier, and others. The company targets luxury consumers and fashion industry stakeholders globally, supported by a multilingual website and a dedicated business portal. The presence of a vulnerability disclosure policy suggests a mature approach to security governance. The company’s digital presence is consistent with its market position, leveraging multimedia content and marketing tools to engage its audience. The domain registration and WHOIS data align well with the company’s claims, reinforcing legitimacy and trust.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is currently weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While several security headers are implemented, the Content Security Policy is overly permissive with 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' directives, which could be exploited. No advanced TLS protocols or session resumption mechanisms are enabled, and OCSP stapling is absent. The site uses secure and HttpOnly cookies, which is positive. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency. The presence of a vulnerability disclosure policy is a positive indicator but no security.txt file was found. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues is critical to improve the security score and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols.
  3. Strengthen Content Security Policy by removing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' directives.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  5. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kering Eyewear S.p.A.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, and integrates Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and cookie consent management. It uses the Plyr video player for multimedia content. Hosting is on Microsoft Azure, as indicated by HTTP headers and resource URLs. The site is multilingual with hreflang tags for English, Italian, French, and Chinese. Performance data indicates no load time or resource metrics available, suggesting incomplete performance monitoring. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. However, the lack of SSL/TLS and HTTPS is a significant technical risk. The CMS appears custom or proprietary, with no common CMS detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience but requires security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with keringeyewear.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review keringeyewear.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.