Kauppakeskus Goodman is a well-established shopping center located in Hämeenlinna, Finland, operated by Kiinteistö Oy Hämeenlinnakeskus. The website presents a clear business focus on retail and leisure services, targeting local residents and visitors. The site offers a comprehensive range of shops, cafes, and restaurants, positioning itself as a community hub. The domain age and registrant information align well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and transparency.
Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and performs moderately well. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categorization, supporting GDPR compliance.
Security posture is strong with no critical issues detected. However, the site lacks explicit security policy and incident response contact information, which could enhance trust and compliance. Privacy compliance is good, supported by cookie consent and a privacy policy, though explicit contact emails and phone numbers are not present in the analyzed HTML.
Overall, Kauppakeskus Goodman demonstrates a solid digital presence with good security and privacy practices. Strategic improvements could include publishing security policies and incident response details to further strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention kauppakeskusgoodman.fi, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for kauppakeskusgoodman.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The shopping center operates in the retail and real estate sectors, serving as a local commercial and leisure destination. Its business model revolves around leasing retail spaces and providing amenities to shoppers. The website targets Finnish-speaking customers primarily, with English language support. The company benefits from a mature domain and consistent branding. Marketing efforts leverage major ad networks and analytics platforms, indicating a data-driven approach. No affiliate or suspicious partnerships were detected. The business appears stable with a clear market position in Hämeenlinna.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS with strong security headers, indicating a good baseline security posture. Cookie consent management is comprehensive, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response contacts is a gap. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were detected. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and incident response processes.
Recommendations
Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider adding a security.txt file.
Enhance contact information visibility on the website, including phone and email contacts.
Regularly review and update cookie and privacy policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Kiinteistö Oy Hämeenlinnakeskus
Description
Kauppakeskus Goodman is a shopping center in Hämeenlinna, Finland, offering a wide range of fashion, leisure shops, small stores, cafes, restaurants, and daily grocery shopping.
Key services
Retail shops, Cafes and restaurants, Grocery shopping
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery 1.12.4, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Cookie consent implemented
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Meta Platforms
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website uses HTTPS with good security headers.
Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage HTML.
Business info is primarily from WHOIS and structured data.
No visible security or privacy policy pages found in main HTML but likely present on site.
No signs of malware or phishing.
Uses common marketing and analytics tools with consent.
No WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is powered by WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin for search optimization. It uses jQuery 1.12.4 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent and compliance. The site loads asynchronously scripts for performance and uses modern meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Hosting provider details are not explicit but DNS is managed by Opiferum Oy. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in script loading and caching.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with kauppakeskusgoodman.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kauppakeskusgoodman.fi.