Skip to main content

Security report for kasse.ee

Kasse Paadid OÜ · Transportation · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kasse Paadid OÜ is a small Estonian boat manufacturer specializing in rowboats, motorboats, and fishing boats, with a history dating back to 1994. The company operates primarily in the transportation sector, targeting boating enthusiasts and customers in Estonia and nearby regions. Their website presents a professional and consistent brand image, offering product information, contact details, and social media links. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 4.7.29 with several plugins and uses jQuery 1.12.4, indicating some technical debt and potential security risks due to outdated software. The website is accessible, mobile responsive at a basic level, and has clear navigation, but lacks modern SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and outdated components. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional and credible but requires updates and enhancements to improve security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kasse.ee

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kasse.ee, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kasse.ee right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a stable market position as a local boat manufacturer with over 25 years of experience. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and selling boats and related accessories, supplemented by repair services. The target audience includes boating and fishing enthusiasts in Estonia. The website supports business credibility with clear contact information and social media presence but lacks advanced marketing or analytics tools. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website. Growth potential exists through modernization of digital presence and enhanced security and privacy compliance.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption, ensuring secure data transmission. However, it uses outdated WordPress and jQuery versions, which may expose it to known vulnerabilities. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, reducing protection against common web attacks. Forms are handled via Contact Form 7, a widely used plugin, but no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking GDPR-related disclosures or cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires urgent updates and policy implementations to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  4. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to supported versions to avoid security risks.
  5. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve trust and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kasse Paadid OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kasse Paadid OÜ
Description
Kasse Paadid OÜ is a boat manufacturer located in Saikla, Saaremaa, Estonia, producing rowboats since 1994. They offer rowboats, motorboats, fishing boats, boat trailers, accessories, and repair services.
Key services
Boat manufacturing, Boat trailers, Accessories, Boat repair services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, WordPress 4.7.29, PHP (implied by WordPress), Nivo Slider, Contact Form 7, The Events Calendar plugin, qTranslate-X
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Contact Form 7 plugin for forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, physical address, and contact form.
  4. Website uses an outdated WordPress version and jQuery library, posing potential security risks.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  6. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook and YouTube links.
  8. Website content is relevant and professionally presented with clear navigation.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph meta tags found in the HTML head.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on an older WordPress version (4.7.29) with plugins such as Contact Form 7 and The Events Calendar. It uses jQuery 1.12.4 and Nivo Slider for UI elements. The site loads moderate resources and is moderately optimized for mobile devices. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses multiple CSS and JS files hosted on the same domain. There is no evidence of modern frontend frameworks or CDN usage. Technical debt is present due to outdated software versions, which should be addressed to improve security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kasse.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kasse.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.