Skip to main content

Security report for karpatokalapitvany.hu

Kárpátok Alapítvány - Magyarország · Non-profit · Hungary

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kárpátok Alapítvány - Magyarország is a small-sized non-profit foundation focused on community development, social inclusion, and education in the Carpathian region spanning five countries. The organization operates primarily through donations, grants, and partnerships, targeting disadvantaged communities and civil organizations. The website is professionally designed using Drupal 8 CMS, with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. It provides comprehensive information about its programs, strategic goals, and partners, enhancing its credibility and trustworthiness. However, the site lacks published privacy and cookie policies, which impacts GDPR compliance and privacy posture. Security-wise, HTTPS is enabled, but no explicit security headers were detected, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain registration data aligns well with the organization's claims, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the website is a reliable and professional platform for the foundation's mission but should improve privacy and security disclosures to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching karpatokalapitvany.hu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a strong position in the regional non-profit sector, focusing on cross-border cooperation and capacity building in marginalized areas. Its business model relies on grants, donations, and partnerships with European and local entities. The target audience includes civil society actors, disadvantaged youth, and donors interested in social development. The organization demonstrates a stable operational history since 2002, with a clear strategic focus and multiple active programs. Partnerships with recognized networks like Transnational Giving Europe enhance its funding and outreach capabilities. The website content and structure support transparency and engagement, although the absence of formal privacy and security policies suggests room for compliance improvement.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption, ensuring secure data transmission. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces protection against certain web attacks. No forms or input fields were detected on the analyzed page, minimizing immediate risks of injection or data leakage. The absence of published incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. No known vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers, formal policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to meet GDPR and privacy compliance requirements.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance web security.
  3. Add an incident response contact or abuse email to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding user consent mechanisms for cookies and tracking to improve privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kárpátok Alapítvány - Magyarország
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kárpátok Alapítvány - Magyarország
Description
The Kárpátok Alapítvány is a non-profit foundation focused on supporting and developing communities in the Carpathian region, including Poland, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, and Ukraine. It promotes civil society strengthening, social inclusion, education, and regional development through various programs, scholarships, and partnerships.
Key services
Grant and donation programs, Scholarships, Training and capacity building, Consultation and assistance to civil organizations and local governments, Cross-border cooperation projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 8, Bootstrap 3.3.7, FontAwesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit foundation site.
  2. Content is comprehensive about programs and organizational goals.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  5. No forms detected that collect user data on the analyzed page.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram is linked.
  7. Use of Drupal CMS and standard web technologies.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Clear contact information with phone, email, and physical address provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 8 CMS, leveraging Bootstrap 3.3.7 for responsive design and FontAwesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site loads external CSS and JS resources from trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation menus and content sections. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the data. The site uses HTTPS, but no advanced security headers were found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modern security enhancements and privacy tools.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with karpatokalapitvany.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review karpatokalapitvany.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.