Skip to main content

Security report for karanube.com

Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ChiqueChics.com is an e-commerce website specializing in trendy women's dresses and everyday style apparel. The site targets fashion-conscious women seeking stylish clothing with fast shipping. The business appears to be a small online boutique launched in 2023, leveraging the Shopline platform for its e-commerce infrastructure. The website employs modern technologies including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Stripe payment integrations supporting Apple Pay and Google Pay. While the site is professionally designed with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, it lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts its privacy compliance score. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for online retail but should enhance transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching karanube.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector focusing on women's fashion apparel. Its market positioning is that of a trendy online boutique offering standout dresses and everyday style. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with fast shipping as a key service. The company maintains active social media channels on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, and TikTok to engage its target audience. Payment processing is handled via Stripe, supporting modern payment methods. The domain registration is consistent with a new business, and no suspicious patterns are detected. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with no parent or subsidiary companies identified.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized domain changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information. The site uses multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts, indicating extensive user tracking. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to improve DNS security and add security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Shop trendy women’s clothing and standout dresses at ChiqueChics. Fast shipping, fresh styles, and fashion that fits your lifestyle.
Key services
Online sales of women's dresses and clothing, Fast shipping
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Shopline e-commerce platform, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Pinterest tracking, Stripe payment gateway, Apple Pay, Google Pay, JavaScript ES6+, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Shopline proprietary framework
Platforms
Shopline
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Google Universal Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics 4, Google Universal Analytics, Pinterest tracking
Marketing tools
Shopline Conversion Booster
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small online retail store specializing in women's dresses and fashion
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. Strong use of third-party marketing and analytics tools
  4. Payment options include Apple Pay and Google Pay via Stripe
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page or metadata
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  7. Domain is relatively new but properly registered without privacy protection
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Shopline e-commerce platform, utilizing modern web technologies including ES6 JavaScript, CSS3, and HTML5. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Pinterest tracking. Payment processing is handled via Stripe with support for Apple Pay and Google Pay. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design principles. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and preconnect hints. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The domain is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC and is relatively new, consistent with the business launch.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with karanube.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review karanube.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.