Skip to main content

Security report for kabinett.com

株式会社カビネット · Technology · Japan

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

株式会社カビネット is a Japanese IT company specializing in cloud services, software system development, and design content production. Established in 1998, it serves primarily business clients in Japan with a focus on delivering customer value through IT and communication. The company maintains a professional web presence with clear service descriptions, case studies, and recruitment information, positioning itself as a reliable mid-sized IT service provider. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel, and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured with good SEO practices. However, there is no visible cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap given the use of tracking scripts. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and displays trust certifications like the Privacy Mark and Secom Trust Systems badge, indicating a commitment to privacy and security. Nonetheless, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit security or incident response policies suggests room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and functional with moderate technical sophistication. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security practices would enhance its risk profile and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kabinett.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

株式会社カビネット operates in the Technology sector, focusing on cloud services, software development, and design content production. Its business model is B2B, targeting companies needing IT infrastructure, custom software, and digital design. The company leverages its long history since 1998 to build credibility and trust. It maintains a partnership ecosystem evidenced by certifications but no explicit partner domains were found. The company’s growth is supported by clear service offerings and recruitment efforts. Competitive advantages include integrated IT and design services and a stable market presence in Japan.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and displays recognized trust marks, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies or incident response contacts indicates gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness is not publicly documented. Overall, the security culture appears cautious but could benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
株式会社カビネット
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
株式会社カビネット
Description
株式会社カビネットは、クラウドサービス・ソフトウェアシステム開発・デザインコンテンツ制作に特化した会社です。CREATE A CUSTOMERS VALUE・ITのチカラとコミュニケーションでお客様の満足を。
Key services
クラウドサービス, ソフトウェアシステム開発, デザインコンテンツ制作
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS assumed (based on URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security certification badges (Privacy Mark, Secom Trust Systems)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Japanese targeting Japanese IT industry clients.
  3. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of Google Analytics.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with physical addresses and phone numbers.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of trusted certifications (Privacy Mark, Secom Trust Systems) enhances trust.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. No forms with email fields detected; contact form link provided but form details not in HTML snippet.
  9. No terms of service page found.
  10. SEO and metadata are well implemented with relevant keywords and descriptions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a straightforward technical stack with jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components and Google Analytics for tracking. The HTML is well-structured with appropriate meta tags for SEO. Hosting is likely through a Japanese provider associated with the registrar GMO Internet Group. Performance is moderate with some asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. There is no detected CMS, indicating a custom or static site approach. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kabinett.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kabinett.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.