Skip to main content

Security report for juz-eckental.de

JUZ Eckental · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JUZ Eckental is a community youth center based in Germany that serves as a cultural and event hub for local residents, particularly targeting both young and older audiences. The website primarily provides information about upcoming events such as parties, concerts, and cultural activities, fostering community engagement. The organization appears to operate as a small non-profit entity focused on local community services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Twenty Seventeen theme, leveraging common web technologies like jQuery and Google Fonts. The site is hosted on a server associated with nevsware.de and uses HTTPS to secure communications. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and incident response disclosures. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the website is functional, well-structured, and provides relevant content for its audience but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching juz-eckental.de

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions JUZ Eckental as a local community center offering event hosting and cultural activities, targeting youth and adults in the Eckental area. Its business model is non-profit and community-oriented, relying on event participation and local engagement rather than commercial revenue streams. The site shows limited digital marketing or analytics integration, indicating a focus on organic community reach. The presence of a Facebook page suggests some social media engagement. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a trustworthy local presence. However, the lack of explicit contact information and formal business details limits business credibility and outreach potential.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption ensuring secure data transmission. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and limited privacy compliance indicators suggest gaps in GDPR adherence. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy controls, and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, including a security.txt file, to facilitate responsible reporting and handling of security issues.
  4. Provide explicit contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update the website’s privacy policy to ensure full GDPR compliance and communicate data handling practices clearly to users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JUZ Eckental
Description
Jugendzentrum Eckental, a community center where young and old come together, hosting events such as parties, concerts, and cultural activities.
Key services
Event hosting, Community engagement, Cultural activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, PHP (implied by WordPress), Google Fonts (Open Sans, Noto Serif)
Frameworks
WordPress Twenty Seventeen Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a community youth center site with event listings and basic information.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or visible content.
  3. Privacy policy page exists but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  4. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  5. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  6. Website uses WordPress with a standard theme and common libraries.
  7. No advanced tracking or advertising detected.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook link in footer.
  9. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. HTTPS is enabled and used site-wide.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable and widely used CMS platform, WordPress 6.8.3, using the Twenty Seventeen theme, which is well-maintained and supported. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Fonts for typography, ensuring a modern and responsive design. Hosting appears to be on a server associated with nevsware.de, with domain DNS managed via domaincontrol.com (GoDaddy). Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or third-party trackers, contributing to reasonable load times. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with semantic HTML and ARIA attributes for screen readers. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. There is an opportunity to enhance SEO and performance by optimizing images, adding structured data, and improving meta information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with juz-eckental.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review juz-eckental.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.