Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention jusuprekes.lt, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for jusuprekes.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
UAB "Interneto vizija" (registrar) · Retail · Lithuania
Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.
JusuPrekes.lt is a Lithuanian e-commerce platform specializing in retail sales of furniture, home and garden products, automotive accessories, and a broad range of consumer goods. The website targets both individual consumers and businesses within Lithuania, offering a comprehensive catalog sourced from multiple international markets including Germany, the USA, the UK, and Europe. The business model is primarily online retail with customer support and delivery services. The site is relatively new, with domain registration in November 2024, and is operated under a Lithuanian registrar, indicating local market focus and legitimacy. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. It is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, ensuring reliable performance and security. The platform is built on EcomCart.eu, a specialized e-commerce CMS, providing structured product categories and responsive design. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are adequately implemented, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, and no dedicated security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business profile, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, JusuPrekes.lt presents as a professional and legitimate e-commerce site with good content quality and technical implementation. Security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is well addressed through cookie consent and privacy policy presence. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult content detected.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Detected services: Google Analytics
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention jusuprekes.lt, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for jusuprekes.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with jusuprekes.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jusuprekes.lt.