Skip to main content

Security report for juraszeme.lv

Biedrība "Jūras zeme" · Non-profit · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Biedrība "Jūras zeme" is a Latvian non-profit organization dedicated to supporting coastal and rural community development through various projects and cooperation initiatives. The organization targets local communities and project applicants, providing funding and facilitating collaboration to enhance regional development. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with a focus on project information and community engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including accessibility features and responsive design, though some components like WordPress core are slightly outdated. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking explicit security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching juraszeme.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a small non-profit entity focused on regional development in Latvia, leveraging project funding and community cooperation as its primary business model. It maintains partnerships with governmental and regional bodies, as evidenced by external links to ministries and local municipalities. The website content and social media presence indicate active engagement in events and project dissemination. The business model is service-oriented, supporting local development rather than commercial revenue generation. Growth indicators include ongoing project announcements and collaborations with European regional initiatives.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications, and uses updated JavaScript libraries minimizing common vulnerabilities. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against certain attacks. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. Tracking scripts from Google Analytics and Facebook imply moderate user data collection without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be improved by implementing best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Update WordPress core and plugins regularly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance security transparency.
  5. Enhance contact information with direct company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biedrība "Jūras zeme"
Description
Non-profit organization focused on coastal and rural community development, project support, and regional cooperation in Latvia.
Key services
Project support and funding, Community cooperation projects, Information dissemination and event organization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.6.14, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Fonts, Font Awesome 4 and 5, Contact Form 7, WP Accessibility Helper, QuadMenu, WP Responsive Recent Post Slider Pro, UIX Shortcodes, AddThis
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of latest jQuery and WordPress versions (though WordPress 5.6.14 is somewhat outdated)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AddThis
Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
AddThis, Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit organization site focused on coastal and rural development projects in Latvia.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is limited to a contact page and newsletter subscription form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Multiple social media profiles linked including Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Flickr.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and accessibility features is evident.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content provided.
  8. Google Analytics and Facebook tracking scripts are present indicating moderate user tracking.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.6.14 with a variety of plugins including Contact Form 7, WP Accessibility Helper, and QuadMenu, indicating a mature but somewhat dated technical stack. The site uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons, and integrates social media SDKs and analytics tools. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design. Accessibility features are implemented via a dedicated plugin. Technical risks include outdated WordPress version and missing security headers. The site is hosted on an unknown provider with no explicit hosting details. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with juraszeme.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review juraszeme.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.