Skip to main content

Security report for juno.lv

AS Juno · Real Estate · Latvia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AS Juno operates as a Latvian company specializing in the purchase of forest properties and logging areas across Latvia. The company positions itself as a regional buyer offering competitive prices and efficient purchasing procedures. The website reflects a small-sized business with a clear focus on the real estate sector related to forestry land. The digital presence is built on a WordPress platform using Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with good SEO and mobile optimization. The site integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, including HubSpot, Google Analytics, TikTok Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity, demonstrating an active approach to marketing and user behavior analysis. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot, but lacks visible security headers and published privacy or terms of service policies, which are important for compliance and trust. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching juno.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AS Juno targets forest landowners and sellers in Latvia, operating in the niche real estate sector focused on forestry properties. The business model centers on purchasing forest and logging areas, likely generating revenue through resale or management of these assets. The company maintains a Facebook presence and uses advanced marketing and analytics tools to engage and understand its audience. The lack of detailed contact information and corporate disclosures on the website suggests a small or medium enterprise with limited public-facing corporate transparency. The integration of multiple tracking and advertising platforms indicates a strategic approach to customer acquisition and retention. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content or linked domains.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, which are positive security and privacy practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness in case of security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by the cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be improved with additional controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, processing, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance site security.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate an incident response contact to improve trust and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AS Juno
Description
AS Juno iegādājas meža īpašumus un cirsmas visā Latvijā, nodrošinot augstas cenas un ātru pirkšanas procedūru.
Key services
Forest and logging area purchase
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Elementor 3.27.6, Yoast SEO 24.6, HubSpot scripts, Microsoft Clarity, TikTok Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Meta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Elementor and Yoast SEO.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot.
  3. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are loaded.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the HTML content.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook link.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. HTTPS is enforced and SSL configuration appears good.
  10. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Elementor 3.27.6 and Yoast SEO 24.6, indicating use of modern CMS and SEO tools. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing technologies including HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, TikTok Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing third-party scripts. Accessibility is basic, with room for enhancements to meet higher standards. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. The technical stack is typical for small to medium business websites but requires ongoing maintenance to ensure security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with juno.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review juno.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.