Skip to main content

Security report for jungent.lt

Jungent Lietuva UAB · Retail · Lithuania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jungent Lietuva UAB is a well-established sales promotion and brand marketing company operating in the Baltic region since 1991. It represents over 60 international and local suppliers, serving retail, HoReCa, pharmacies, and other B2B clients. The company is part of the Jungent Group, which employs over 700 people and has a broad client base across Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business information and active social media presence. Technically, the website is built on the Voog CMS platform using modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Google Fonts. It employs Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Performance is moderate with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and does not expose sensitive data. However, it lacks some recommended security headers and does not provide explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with privacy and cookie policies present, but no active cookie consent mechanism is implemented. Overall, the website is credible and trustworthy with a solid business foundation. The main risks relate to improving security best practices and enhancing privacy compliance to meet evolving regulatory standards. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding a security.txt file, establishing incident response contacts, and deploying a cookie consent mechanism to strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jungent.lt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jungent Lietuva UAB holds a strong market position as a leading brand marketer and sales promotion company in the Baltic states. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive supplier network, diversified product portfolio, and established distribution channels serving over 7500 direct clients. The business model focuses on B2B sales and marketing services, targeting retail, HoReCa, and pharmacy sectors. Revenue streams likely derive from supplier partnerships, distribution agreements, and logistics services. The company’s ecosystem includes subsidiaries in Estonia, Latvia, and logistics firms, indicating a well-integrated regional presence. Growth indicators include a large workforce and multi-country operations. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to leverage digital marketing tools and enhance security and compliance frameworks to maintain competitive edge.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive information. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a moderate gap that could be exploited in certain attack scenarios. Lack of incident response and vulnerability disclosure information limits transparency and preparedness for security events. Privacy policies are present, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements, but the missing cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with room for improvement in proactive security controls and compliance documentation. Business impact of current gaps is moderate, primarily reputational and regulatory risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Establish and display incident response procedures and dedicated security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Deploy a cookie consent banner/mechanism to ensure active user consent and enhance GDPR compliance.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jungent Lietuva UAB
VAT number
LT100000001819
Registration number
111465368
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jungent Lietuva UAB
Description
Jungent Lietuva UAB is a sales promotion company operating in the Baltic states since 1991, representing over 60 international and local suppliers. It serves retail, HoReCa, pharmacies, and other B2B clients with a portfolio of leading brands. The Jungent Group employs over 700 people and has more than 7500 direct clients in the Baltic markets.
Key services
Brand marketing, Sales promotion, Distribution, Logistics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Voog CMS, Edicy Gallery
Platforms
Voog CMS platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with no visible security issues.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company emails and phone numbers.
  6. Social media presence is active on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn.
  7. Website is built on Voog CMS with modern frontend technologies.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  10. Business information is consistent and detailed, supporting credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Voog CMS platform, leveraging modern frontend technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content structure. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. However, the absence of certain security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy implementation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to enhance technical robustness by integrating advanced security controls and improving privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jungent.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jungent.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.