Skip to main content

Security report for jumpropeforheart.ca

Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada · Non-profit · Canada

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jumpropeforheart.ca represents the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada's Jump Rope for Heart fundraising program. It serves as an informational and transactional platform to support fundraising activities, provide educational resources, and facilitate donations and registrations. The site targets schools, teachers, families, and donors interested in supporting heart health initiatives. The business model is non-profit, focusing on community engagement and fundraising for health research and education. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, reflecting a reputable organization in the Canadian non-profit sector. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS with service workers for progressive web app features. However, some improvements could be made in accessibility and explicit privacy and cookie policy disclosures. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities in the HTML content. The lack of explicit security headers and incident response contact information suggests room for enhancement in security posture. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, but the domain aligns with the known foundation, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is a credible and professional platform for a non-profit fundraising initiative, with moderate technical sophistication and a good security baseline. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency would further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jumpropeforheart.ca

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada operates a well-established fundraising program through jumpropeforheart.ca, targeting educational institutions and families to promote heart health awareness and raise funds. The organization leverages digital channels for donations, registrations, and resource dissemination. The market positioning is strong within the Canadian non-profit health sector, supported by recognized branding and a clear mission. The business model relies on community engagement and donor contributions, with potential growth through enhanced digital marketing and expanded educational outreach. Partnerships with schools and sponsors are evident, though no explicit partner domains were identified. The use of analytics and tracking indicates a focus on data-driven engagement strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS and no apparent exposure of sensitive data in the HTML. The use of service workers and modern JavaScript libraries suggests an up-to-date technical environment. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency and readiness. The site does not display cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policy details, which are important for GDPR and other privacy regulations compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with enhanced headers, explicit policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance security transparency and readiness.
  4. Include clear contact information for security and general inquiries to improve trust and communication.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
Description
The website is dedicated to the Jump Rope for Heart program, a fundraising initiative by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. It provides information about fundraising, program details, resources for teachers, families, and kids, and ways to donate or register.
Key services
Fundraising platform, Educational resources, Event registration, Donation processing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Curator.io, Skrollr.js, Universal Script (ubembed.com)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of service workers for PWA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to a non-profit fundraising program.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the homepage HTML.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. Domain WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of modern JavaScript libraries including Facebook SDK, Google Tag Manager, and Curator.io for social content embedding. It employs service workers for PWA capabilities and is optimized for mobile devices. The site appears to be custom-built or uses a proprietary CMS platform, with no common CMS detected. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the organization. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jumpropeforheart.ca. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jumpropeforheart.ca.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.