Skip to main content

Security report for jumploads.com

Jumploads · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jumploads is a cloud storage and file management service that enables users to store, share, and access media files from any device globally. The platform offers subscription-based premium plans with features such as ad-free sharing, resumable downloads, and significant storage and bandwidth allowances. The website is professionally designed with modern UI elements including animations and responsive layouts, targeting general internet users seeking reliable cloud storage solutions. Technically, the site leverages popular JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Lottie animations, integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and bot protection, and is hosted behind Cloudflare, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and bot protection in place, but lacks explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, impacting the overall risk profile. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, publishing security policies, and clarifying domain registration status to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jumploads.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jumploads operates in the competitive cloud storage market, focusing on media storage and file sharing with a subscription revenue model. Its target audience includes general users needing accessible and reliable cloud storage. The company positions itself as a niche provider emphasizing ad-free experiences and high-speed downloads. The website's content and structure suggest a small-sized technology business without publicly disclosed founding year or parent company affiliations. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers may limit customer trust and support accessibility. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data, and no certifications or compliance frameworks are advertised. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not disclosed, suggesting a lean operation focused on core service delivery.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA integration to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth effectiveness. No explicit incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency and preparedness perception. The lack of cookie consent and GDPR compliance indicators suggests potential compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis, but continuous monitoring and security hardening are recommended to maintain resilience. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhanced policies, headers, and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and privacy compliance mechanisms to align with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish detailed security policies and incident response procedures to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Clarify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to enhance legitimacy.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jumploads
Description
Jumploads is a cloud storage and file management service that allows users to store, share, and access media files from any device, anywhere.
Key services
Cloud storage, File sharing, Ad-free downloads, Resumable downloads
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Lottie animations, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Axios
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain expiration or non-registration.
  3. Site offers cloud storage and file sharing services with subscription plans.
  4. Privacy and terms pages are present but cookie consent is missing.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  6. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and bot protection.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with jQuery, jQuery UI, Lottie animations, and Axios for asynchronous requests. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are employed for user behavior tracking, while Google reCAPTCHA protects forms from bots. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is basic with meta description and viewport tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph metadata. Accessibility features are minimal but present. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential privacy compliance gaps. Opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security hardening to enhance overall technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jumploads.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jumploads.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.