Skip to main content

Security report for judoverse.org

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Judoverse.org is a website dedicated to a judo-themed NFT project, offering digital collectibles related to the sport of judo. The site targets NFT enthusiasts and fans of judo, leveraging blockchain technology to create unique digital assets. The business appears to be a small-scale, recently founded entity (2022) focusing on niche digital collectibles. The website features SVG animations and a clean, modern design but lacks comprehensive textual content and detailed business descriptions. Technically, the site uses Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics, with HTTPS enabled, ensuring basic security and performance standards. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are missing, which could be improved to enhance security posture. The security posture is moderate, with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and security transparency. Contact is primarily through an external Discord link, with no direct company emails or phone numbers provided. Overall, the site is functional and moderately secure but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: l6krclina4427znn4fz65otf4ief4q4nm3zl7uqrrknk4c5xauka.mx-verification.google.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching judoverse.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Judoverse operates in the technology sector, specifically within the NFT and blockchain space, focusing on judo-themed digital collectibles. The business model revolves around creating and possibly selling NFTs to a niche audience. The domain age and registration details align with a new project typical in the NFT market. The company leverages external platforms like Discord for community engagement and communication. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The lack of detailed business information and contact details limits the ability to fully assess market positioning and growth potential. The use of Google Analytics indicates an interest in tracking user engagement, but the absence of privacy policies may affect user trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, providing a secure transport layer and DNS management. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain security against unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There are no visible forms collecting sensitive data, reducing attack surface, but also no explicit security or incident response policies or contacts. Google Analytics is used without visible cookie consent, which may pose privacy compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by implementing recommended headers, enabling DNSSEC, and adding privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails for general and security incident reporting.
  5. Enhance SEO metadata and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Key services
Judo world NFT collectibles
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, SVG animations, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an NFT project focused on judo-themed digital collectibles.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact is primarily via Discord external link; no direct company emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers.
  5. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. Content is mostly graphical (SVG animations) with minimal textual description.
  7. No forms detected for data collection on the main page.
  8. No security or incident response policies or contacts found.
  9. WHOIS data is public and consistent with the website's purpose and hosting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including SVG animations, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, SEO optimization is minimal with empty meta keywords and description tags. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The site loads moderately fast but could benefit from performance optimizations such as caching and minification. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small NFT project but has room for modernization and enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with judoverse.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review judoverse.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.