Jubla Burgdorf is a non-profit youth organization based in Burgdorf, Switzerland, offering engaging leisure activities and diverse holiday camps primarily targeting children and adolescents. The organization maintains a strong local presence with affiliations to national and regional partners such as Jungwacht Blauring Schweiz and Swiss Olympic, enhancing its community credibility and outreach. The website reflects a well-structured, content-rich platform with clear navigation and a focus on community engagement through events, groups, and leadership opportunities.
Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 Neos CMS using modern web technologies including lazy loading images and responsive design, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a basic imprint page but no dedicated cookie consent or comprehensive privacy policy.
Overall, the security posture is adequate for the organization's scope, with no critical vulnerabilities detected. The domain registration is consistent with the organization's identity and location, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, implementing security headers, and publishing incident response information to strengthen trust and compliance. The website is safe for general audiences, with no adult or explicit content detected.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Network security
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
High
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
55
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention jublaburgdorf.ch, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for jublaburgdorf.ch right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Jubla Burgdorf operates as a small-sized non-profit entity focused on youth development through recreational and educational activities. Its market positioning is local with strong ties to national youth organizations, providing a competitive advantage in community trust and resource sharing. The business model centers on volunteer leadership and event-driven engagement, with revenue likely derived from membership fees, donations, and sponsorships. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized Swiss sports and cultural organizations, enhancing its legitimacy and operational support. Growth indicators include active recruitment for leadership roles and regular event updates, signaling ongoing community involvement and sustainability.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form submission methods. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. Compliance gaps exist in privacy and cookie consent mechanisms, which could expose the organization to regulatory risks under GDPR. Incident response readiness is not publicly documented, limiting transparency. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, suitable for a non-profit community organization but with room for improvement to meet higher compliance standards.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Develop a long-term security strategy focusing on staff training, data protection, and compliance monitoring.
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
Content is primarily in German targeting local youth in Burgdorf, Switzerland.
Strong community and non-profit focus with clear contact information.
No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which is a compliance gap.
No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Good use of modern web technologies and responsive design.
Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook supports community engagement.
No advertising or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious approach.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on TYPO3 Neos CMS with a modern front-end stack including CSS3, JavaScript, and lazy loading for images, contributing to good performance and mobile responsiveness. The use of Slick Carousel enhances user experience with interactive slideshows. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and meta tags supporting SEO. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved to meet WCAG standards. Hosting details are not explicit, but the use of CDN for static assets suggests a distributed content delivery approach. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small non-profit but could benefit from modernization in accessibility and security implementations.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with jublaburgdorf.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jublaburgdorf.ch.