Skip to main content

Security report for jspice.eu

Johnny Spice · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Johnny Spice is a small retail business specializing in savory seasonings designed to enhance snack foods, including vegan and gluten-free popcorn seasonings. The company targets snack consumers seeking flavorful and convenient seasoning options. The website is built on the Hostinger Website Builder platform using the Astro framework, incorporating Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and clear navigation, but lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, as well as direct contact information beyond a contact form. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jspice.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Johnny Spice operates in the niche retail sector focusing on snack seasonings with unique flavors and convenient packaging. The business model is e-commerce retail, targeting health-conscious and flavor-seeking consumers. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized company with consistent branding and a moderate level of professionalism. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of direct contact details and privacy policies may limit trust and customer confidence. The company could benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for protecting against common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are present, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security maturity is basic, with room for significant improvement to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  3. Provide direct contact information such as company email and phone number to enhance business credibility.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to improve security readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and protect user data.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Johnny Spice
Description
Johnny Spice offers a range of savory seasonings designed to enhance snacks, including vegan and gluten-free popcorn seasonings with unique flavors and convenient grab-and-go packaging.
Key services
Savory seasonings for snacks, Popcorn seasoning products, Online product information and contact
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Fonts, Astro framework, Hostinger Website Builder
Frameworks
Astro
Platforms
Hostinger Website Builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with Google Analytics for tracking
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact available only via a contact form on a dedicated page
  4. Site built using Hostinger Website Builder and Astro framework
  5. No social media or direct contact emails/phone numbers found
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content
  7. Content is focused on vegan and gluten-free snack seasonings
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern technologies including the Astro framework and hosted on Hostinger Website Builder. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and analytics respectively. The site loads with moderate performance and is well optimized for mobile devices. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices and improving privacy transparency to reduce risks and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jspice.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jspice.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.