Skip to main content

Security report for jpgglobal.net

Jupiter Prestige Group · Retail · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jupiter Prestige Group is a medium-sized B2B company specializing in integrated packaging graphics services, including brand strategy, packaging design, prepress production, and artwork management. The company targets brand owners and packaging professionals globally, with offices in multiple international locations. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive information about services and the senior management team. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Fonts, with good SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, though security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, enhancing trust. However, the WHOIS data for the domain www.jpgglobal.net is missing or indicates the domain is unregistered or expired, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and business credibility. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front but domain registration inconsistencies should be addressed.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jpgglobal.net

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
74
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and manufacturing sectors, providing specialized packaging graphics and brand management services. Its business model focuses on delivering end-to-end packaging lifecycle solutions to leading brand owners, positioning itself as a strategic partner. The presence of multiple international offices suggests a global footprint. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a LinkedIn presence to enhance credibility. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts in packaging design, prepress production, and related consulting. The website content and structure indicate a mature organization with a clear market position, though the lack of direct contact emails and phone numbers may limit immediate customer engagement. The domain registration inconsistency is a notable risk factor in business intelligence assessment.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie consent and privacy policies. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Address the domain registration inconsistency by verifying and updating WHOIS records to align with the active website presence.
  5. Enhance contact information availability by providing verified company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jupiter Prestige Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jupiter Prestige Group
Description
Jupiter Prestige Group focuses on delivering fully integrated packaging graphics services including brand strategy, packaging design, prepress production, artwork management, and print quality management. They serve leading brand owners with innovative and effective packaging lifecycle solutions.
Key services
Branding Strategy and Packaging Design, Product and Food Photography, Packaging Content Management and Artwork Automation, Artwork and Prepress Production, Color and Print Quality Management, CGI Packshots and 3D Product Images, Artwork Management Software
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Modernizr, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, Ionicons, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available for domain, indicating potential registration issues
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site
  5. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  7. Use of modern web technologies and standard libraries
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of established front-end technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Modernizr, and icon fonts such as Font Awesome and Ionicons. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Slick Carousel is employed for image sliders. The site loads asynchronously Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts for analytics and marketing purposes. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA indicates protection against automated abuse. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with skip links and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs for fonts and scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updates to newer framework versions and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jpgglobal.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jpgglobal.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.