Skip to main content

Security report for jouwplatformrechten.nl

Bits of Freedom · Non-profit · Netherlands

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Blijf Luid | Bits of Freedom' is an advocacy platform focused on informing users about their digital rights and new European regulations that empower users to claim their online space more freely and autonomously. It is operated by Bits of Freedom, a non-profit organization based in the Netherlands. The site targets a general audience interested in digital rights and platform freedoms, providing educational content and advocacy resources. Technically, the site is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, with custom fonts and a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. Matomo analytics is employed, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach to user tracking. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of explicit security headers and security policy pages suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is limited due to the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could enhance transparency and compliance by publishing relevant policies and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jouwplatformrechten.nl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jouwplatformrechten.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jouwplatformrechten.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bits of Freedom positions itself as a key player in digital rights advocacy within the Netherlands, leveraging educational content and awareness campaigns to influence public opinion and policy. The business model is non-profit and advocacy-driven, focusing on empowering users rather than commercial revenue. The organization benefits from consistent branding and a clear mission, though the lack of detailed business information and contact data on the site limits external validation. The use of Matomo analytics aligns with privacy values, and the site’s technical infrastructure supports a modern user experience. Growth potential lies in expanding content, improving compliance transparency, and enhancing user engagement through contact channels and policy disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no apparent exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which are important for transparency and user trust. The site does not include a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, limiting avenues for responsible vulnerability reporting. While no critical vulnerabilities were detected, implementing these best practices would strengthen the security posture and compliance with standards such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add visible contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bits of Freedom
Description
Het is tijd om jouw ruimte op te eisen. Met nieuwe Europese regels, die je helpen jouw boodschap te vertellen, vrijer en autonomer. Zorg dat jouw stem online gehoord blijft.
Key services
Information on digital rights, Advocacy for online freedom, Educational content about platform rights
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Vue.js, Matomo Analytics, Custom fonts (Freedom Font, Hackney)
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or linked pages.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided in the HTML content.
  4. Site uses modern JavaScript frameworks (Nuxt.js and Vue.js) and custom fonts.
  5. Matomo analytics is used, indicating some level of privacy-conscious tracking.
  6. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML.
  8. Content is in Dutch with an English language toggle available.
  9. Site branding is consistent and professional.
  10. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack using Nuxt.js and Vue.js, enabling server-side rendering and a responsive user interface. Custom fonts and optimized images contribute to a good visual experience. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a preference for privacy-respecting tools. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. However, the site lacks explicit accessibility features and some SEO enhancements could be improved by adding structured data and more comprehensive meta tags. Hosting details are not explicit, and no CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site deployment. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jouwplatformrechten.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jouwplatformrechten.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.