The website 'Blijf Luid | Bits of Freedom' is an advocacy platform focused on informing users about their digital rights and new European regulations that empower users to claim their online space more freely and autonomously. It is operated by Bits of Freedom, a non-profit organization based in the Netherlands. The site targets a general audience interested in digital rights and platform freedoms, providing educational content and advocacy resources. Technically, the site is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, with custom fonts and a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. Matomo analytics is employed, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach to user tracking. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of explicit security headers and security policy pages suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is limited due to the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could enhance transparency and compliance by publishing relevant policies and contact information.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention jouwplatformrechten.nl, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for jouwplatformrechten.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Bits of Freedom positions itself as a key player in digital rights advocacy within the Netherlands, leveraging educational content and awareness campaigns to influence public opinion and policy. The business model is non-profit and advocacy-driven, focusing on empowering users rather than commercial revenue. The organization benefits from consistent branding and a clear mission, though the lack of detailed business information and contact data on the site limits external validation. The use of Matomo analytics aligns with privacy values, and the site’s technical infrastructure supports a modern user experience. Growth potential lies in expanding content, improving compliance transparency, and enhancing user engagement through contact channels and policy disclosures.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no apparent exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which are important for transparency and user trust. The site does not include a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, limiting avenues for responsible vulnerability reporting. While no critical vulnerabilities were detected, implementing these best practices would strengthen the security posture and compliance with standards such as GDPR and NIS2.
Recommendations
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
Implement and enforce security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Add visible contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Bits of Freedom
Description
Het is tijd om jouw ruimte op te eisen. Met nieuwe Europese regels, die je helpen jouw boodschap te vertellen, vrijer en autonomer. Zorg dat jouw stem online gehoord blijft.
Key services
Information on digital rights, Advocacy for online freedom, Educational content about platform rights
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or linked pages.
No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided in the HTML content.
Site uses modern JavaScript frameworks (Nuxt.js and Vue.js) and custom fonts.
Matomo analytics is used, indicating some level of privacy-conscious tracking.
No forms detected in the HTML content.
No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML.
Content is in Dutch with an English language toggle available.
Site branding is consistent and professional.
No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack using Nuxt.js and Vue.js, enabling server-side rendering and a responsive user interface. Custom fonts and optimized images contribute to a good visual experience. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a preference for privacy-respecting tools. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. However, the site lacks explicit accessibility features and some SEO enhancements could be improved by adding structured data and more comprehensive meta tags. Hosting details are not explicit, and no CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site deployment. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO practices.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with jouwplatformrechten.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jouwplatformrechten.nl.