Skip to main content

Security report for journity.com

Five Q · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Journity, operated by Five Q, is a specialized service provider offering website personalization solutions tailored for nonprofits. The company focuses on enhancing user journeys by guiding visitors to relevant next steps on nonprofit websites. The business positions itself as a niche player in the nonprofit sector, leveraging modern web technologies and analytics to deliver its services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content relevance and user experience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries and performance optimizations such as lazy loading and New Relic monitoring. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, ensuring reliable infrastructure and HTTPS security. While performance and mobile optimization are good, accessibility features are basic, and SEO is well implemented. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and domain transfer protections but lacks advanced security headers like CSP and DNSSEC. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or vulnerability disclosure, indicating gaps in compliance and transparency. Analytics usage is moderate, with tracking via Google Analytics and New Relic, but privacy compliance is poor due to missing policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user trust. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing vulnerability disclosure information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching journity.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Journity operates in the nonprofit sector, providing website personalization services that help nonprofits optimize user engagement and conversion. The business model centers on SaaS or service offerings tailored to nonprofit organizations. Market positioning is niche, focusing on nonprofits rather than general commercial clients. The company leverages partnerships with analytics and marketing automation providers to enhance its offerings. Growth indicators include a domain age of 7+ years and integration of modern web technologies. The absence of explicit contact information on the website may limit direct customer engagement but aligns with a service-oriented model. The company appears small-sized with consistent branding and a clear value proposition.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and Content Security Policy reduces defense-in-depth. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of reputable hosting and monitoring services like Cloudflare and New Relic adds to operational security. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected, but the site could improve transparency and user trust by publishing security policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clearer contact information to improve user trust and engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Five Q
Description
People don’t naturally explore a website, they squat in areas they know and like. Journity helps them take the relevant next step in their user journey.
Key services
Website personalization, User journey optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Rocket Lazy Load Scripts, New Relic Browser monitoring, Google Fonts, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress, Divi Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and registrar

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Connect, LinkedIn Snap, Marketing Automation Services, WhoisVisiting, UserTracks
Marketing tools
Marketing Automation Services
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in content
  4. Uses WordPress with Divi theme and modern JS libraries
  5. Includes New Relic monitoring scripts
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No GDPR compliance indicators present
  8. Good SEO metadata and structured data present
  9. External links mostly to trusted analytics and font providers
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and lazy loading techniques to optimize performance. Hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare, providing robust infrastructure and HTTPS support. The site includes Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons. New Relic Browser monitoring is integrated for performance and error tracking. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility is basic. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but security headers and DNSSEC are missing, representing modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with journity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review journity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.