Skip to main content

Security report for joma-sport.lt

Joma Sport · Retail · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Joma Sport is an official Lithuanian representative of the Joma brand, specializing in the retail of sports apparel, equipment, and accessories for individual athletes, teams, and leisure consumers. The company operates an e-commerce platform built on WordPress and WooCommerce, offering a wide range of products categorized by gender, sport type, and product type. The website is professionally designed with good navigation, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, targeting the Lithuanian market primarily. Contact information and social media presence are clearly provided, enhancing trust and customer engagement. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Elementor for page building, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and Google Analytics and Tag Manager for traffic analysis. Security measures include HTTPS encryption and Google reCAPTCHA integration to protect forms. However, some security headers are not explicitly detected, and there is no visible cookie consent mechanism, which could be improved for better GDPR compliance. The website performance is moderate, with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site maintains a good posture with encrypted connections and no exposed sensitive data. The WHOIS data confirms a consistent and legitimate domain registration aligned with the business location and operations. No signs of malicious activity or suspicious domains were found. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present, though the cookie policy and incident response information are lacking. Overall, Joma Sport presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security header implementation. Strategic recommendations include adding a cookie consent banner, publishing a security policy with incident response contacts, and enhancing security headers to strengthen protection and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching joma-sport.lt

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Joma Sport holds a solid position as the official distributor of Joma sportswear in Lithuania, focusing on retail sales through an e-commerce platform. Their competitive advantage lies in brand exclusivity and a comprehensive product catalog tailored to various sports and customer segments. The business model is direct-to-consumer online retail, supported by clear contact channels and social media engagement. Revenue streams are primarily product sales, with potential growth through expanded marketing and catalog offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes brand affiliation with Joma and digital marketing tools like Google Analytics. Operationally, the company maintains a focused market presence with consistent branding and localized content, indicating a stable and growth-oriented approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests potential areas for hardening. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is partially evidenced by the privacy policy, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an e-commerce retail site but would benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Publish a detailed security policy and provide clear incident response contact information.
  3. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB "Interneto vizija"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Joma Sport
Description
Sportinė apranga, įranga sportui, sporto aksesuarai, treningai, sportinė avalynė ir sportinės avalynės priežiūros priemonės.
Key services
Sale of sports apparel, Sale of sports equipment, Sale of sports accessories, Online shopping platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official Lithuanian representative of Joma sportswear.
  2. Content is in Lithuanian language targeting local market.
  3. E-commerce platform with WooCommerce and WordPress.
  4. Clear contact information and social media presence.
  5. No visible security or privacy policy beyond basic privacy policy page.
  6. No cookie consent banner detected.
  7. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page design. The tech stack includes SEO optimization via Yoast and analytics through Google services. Hosting appears to be managed by a Lithuanian registrar with local DNS servers, supporting regional performance. The site shows moderate performance with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. Some technical debt is indicated by missing security headers and lack of cookie consent implementation. Modernization opportunities include adopting advanced security headers, improving accessibility compliance, and optimizing performance further to enhance user experience and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with joma-sport.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review joma-sport.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.