Skip to main content

Security report for jogadoresanonimos.com.br

Jogadores Anônimos · Non-profit · Brazil

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jogadores Anônimos is a Brazilian non-profit organization dedicated to supporting individuals struggling with compulsive gambling. The website serves as a hub for information, recovery literature, and access to support groups both online and in-person. It provides contact details including regional offices, WhatsApp helplines, and educational resources. The organization positions itself as a self-sustained community without affiliations to political or religious entities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Elementor and Yoast SEO, hosted on HostGator Brazil. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly but lacks published privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and incident response information are missing. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and safe for general audiences seeking help with gambling addiction.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jogadoresanonimos.com.br

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focusing on addiction recovery. It leverages a community-driven model sustained by member contributions without fees. The website targets compulsive gamblers and their families primarily in Brazil but also connects to international Gamblers Anonymous resources. The presence of multiple regional contacts and WhatsApp helplines indicates a decentralized support network. The business model emphasizes peer support and education rather than commercial services. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized Gamblers Anonymous sites, enhancing credibility. Growth indicators include active online presence and multimedia content. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve compliance and security transparency to strengthen trust and legal standing.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits preparedness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also poses compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. No vulnerable libraries or plugins were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add an incident response contact channel and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing clear information about data protection officers or responsible contacts.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jogadores Anônimos
Description
Irmandade de pessoas que compartilham experiências para parar de jogar compulsivamente, manter abstinência e ajudar outros jogadores compulsivos.
Key services
Support group meetings (in-person and online), Recovery literature, Helpline via WhatsApp, Educational content on compulsive gambling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Smart Slider 3, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of latest WordPress version (6.8.3)
  • Use of security plugins (e.g. WP Meta and Date Remover)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Joinchat WhatsApp integration
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit support community for compulsive gamblers in Brazil.
  2. Content is in Brazilian Portuguese and well structured with clear navigation.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including emails, phone numbers, WhatsApp links, and physical addresses.
  5. No security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present.
  6. Website uses modern WordPress plugins and themes but lacks advanced security headers.
  7. No advertising or tracking services detected except for WhatsApp chat integration.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a contemporary and SEO-aware infrastructure. Hosting is provided by HostGator Brazil, a reputable provider. The site includes multimedia content such as embedded YouTube videos and image sliders powered by Smart Slider 3. Performance is moderate with standard optimizations but could benefit from further speed enhancements. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring accessibility on various devices. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved for compliance with standards like WCAG. The technical stack is stable but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jogadoresanonimos.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jogadoresanonimos.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.