Skip to main content

Security report for jirifof.cz

Jiří Fof · Technology · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

57/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jiří Fof is a freelance web designer and online marketer based in the Czech Republic, offering comprehensive web services including website and e-shop creation, SEO, advertising campaign management, and graphic design. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and mobile optimization. The technical infrastructure is modern and hosted with Wedos, a Czech hosting provider. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling, but lacks security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. Overall, the site is accessible and functional with clear contact information, but could improve privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jirifof.cz

This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
Average
57

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small freelance entity targeting small to medium businesses and individuals seeking web design and marketing services. The market position is niche and localized within the Czech Republic. The business model is service-based with revenue likely generated from project-based engagements. The website lacks social media presence and formal trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials, which could be areas for growth. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the site. The company is registered with a valid registration number and provides clear contact details, supporting business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of reputable WordPress plugins for forms and content management. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in security management. There is no evidence of GDPR compliance mechanisms such as privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding an incident response contact or security policy page to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance business credibility by adding testimonials, certifications, or social media links.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Jiří Fof
Registration number
08816697
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jiří Fof
Description
Freelancer offering comprehensive web design, online marketing, and graphic services including website and e-shop creation, SEO, advertising campaign management, and graphic design for promotional materials.
Key services
Websites & E-shops, Online Marketing, Graphic Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Contact Form 7, Jetpack, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure contact form plugin

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats (stats.wp.com)
Marketing tools
Jetpack, Contact Form 7
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional freelance web design and marketing service site.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and contact form.
  4. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  5. Uses WordPress with Elementor and Contact Form 7 plugins.
  6. No social media links found on the site.
  7. No terms of service or incident response information provided.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder and Contact Form 7 plugin for forms. It uses Jetpack for lazy loading images and WordPress.com Stats for analytics. The hosting provider is Wedos, a Czech hosting company, consistent with the domain registrar. The site is mobile optimized and loads with moderate performance. There is no evidence of advanced accessibility features beyond basic HTML structure. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site uses modern web fonts and standard JavaScript libraries such as jQuery. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small freelance website but could benefit from enhanced SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jirifof.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jirifof.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.