Skip to main content

Security report for jira.cz

JIR Associates s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JIR Associates s.r.o. is a small, family-owned Czech company founded in 2006 by Michal Jíra, focusing primarily on information technology and real estate sectors. The company emphasizes continuity and operates related subsidiaries including fontai.com, lapilou.com, and weetr.com, which provide technology projects, laptop accessories, and email marketing services respectively. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, reflecting a solid digital presence for a small business. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and clipboard.js, integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security, and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. While the site uses HTTPS and has basic security measures, it lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. Security-wise, the site shows a moderate security posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. The contact information is transparent and includes a contact form with anti-bot protection, but no incident response or security policy information is provided. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy for general audiences, but the lack of WHOIS transparency and privacy documentation suggests the company should enhance its compliance and security disclosures to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jira.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JIR Associates operates in niche markets of IT and real estate within the Czech Republic, leveraging a family-owned business model that prioritizes continuity and quality. Their subsidiaries extend their reach into technology consulting, hardware accessories, and email marketing, indicating diversified revenue streams. The company targets business clients and partners requiring IT solutions and real estate services. The presence of a LinkedIn profile for the founder adds credibility and networking potential. The business appears stable but small, with a focus on maintaining consistent service quality rather than rapid expansion. The related domains suggest a strategic ecosystem of complementary services enhancing their market offering.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA v3 protecting the contact form against automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file indicates limited formal incident response readiness. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided data. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing privacy documentation, and establishing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide explicit security incident response contact information and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration data is publicly available and consistent with business information.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize privacy risks and optimize performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
J.I.R. Associates, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ27444007
Registration number
27444007
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JIR Associates s.r.o.
Description
Společnost založená v roce 2006 Michalem Jírou je rodinného charakteru a v současné době se primárně zaměřuje na oblast informačních technologií a realit.
Key services
Information technology consulting and projects, Real estate services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, clipboard.js, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Fonts (Ubuntu), Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented and includes a contact form with reCAPTCHA v3.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Business appears to be a small family-owned company with related domains for subsidiaries or projects.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but simple technology stack including jQuery, clipboard.js, Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA v3, and Google Analytics. The site is served over HTTPS with good SSL configuration. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly set. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but provides basic usability. There is an opportunity to modernize by adopting security headers and improving privacy compliance. The contact form collects user data securely with reCAPTCHA but lacks visible privacy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jira.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jira.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.