Skip to main content

Security report for jfbb.ch

JFB Region Baden · Non-profit · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JFB Region Baden is a regional non-profit organization based in Switzerland providing personal and financial advice and support to residents of the Baden region. The website serves as an informational and contact portal for community members seeking assistance. The organization positions itself as a trusted local service provider with a focus on social support. Technically, the website is built on the Wix platform using Wix Thunderbolt and standard web technologies, offering a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy compliance and incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jfbb.ch

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the non-profit sector, targeting local residents needing advisory services. Its business model is service-oriented without commercial advertising or affiliate programs. The website reflects a consistent brand and clear communication of services. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for maturity in compliance. No suspicious domains or partners were identified, indicating a focused regional operation. The company appears stable with consistent WHOIS data and domain age appropriate for its mission.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, indicating a good baseline security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information limits transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts is limited to Wix services and Sentry for error monitoring, which is positive. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms, representing a compliance risk under GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide security incident contact channels.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding trust signals such as certifications or testimonials to strengthen credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JFB Region Baden
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JFB Region Baden
Description
JFB Region Baden, Beratung und Unterstützung für Einwohner*innen bei persönlichen und finanziellen Problemen
Key services
Personal advice, Financial support, Community assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt, Wix Editor Elements
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Wix Analytics, Sentry (error monitoring)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Marketing tools
Wix built-in analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix technologies
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  3. Contact information is present and includes multiple channels
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  5. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented
  6. No visible forms collecting sensitive data without protection
  7. No advertising or affiliate programs detected
  8. Content is focused on non-profit community support
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Wix's Thunderbolt platform and editor elements, ensuring a modern and maintainable tech stack. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and basic SEO meta tags. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Hosting is managed by Wix, providing reliable infrastructure. The site uses JavaScript polyfills and performance APIs for compatibility and monitoring. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but privacy and compliance features need enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jfbb.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jfbb.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.