Skip to main content

Security report for jedonneenligne.org

Logilys Inc. · Non-profit · Canada

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JeDonneEnLigne.org is a French-language online donation platform initiative by Logilys Inc., targeting charitable organizations and non-profits primarily in Canada. The platform offers integrated online donation form management linked to the Prodon donation management software, enabling organizations to manage donations without programming expertise. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, supporting its niche market position in the non-profit sector. Technically, the site uses a modern but somewhat dated tech stack including jQuery 3.6.3, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google reCAPTCHA v3, and Google Tag Manager. While the site includes important security headers and bot protection, it suffers from a critical lack of a valid SSL certificate and proper TLS protocol support, severely impacting its security posture and user trust. Performance is slow, and no CMS or advanced platform is detected. Security-wise, the site benefits from HSTS and other headers but is undermined by the invalid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS support. No incident response or security policy pages are present, and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, indicating partial privacy compliance. Contact information and trust signals are present but could be enhanced. Overall, the site scores moderately on content and business credibility but poorly on security, resulting in an overall AI score of 58. Strategic improvements in SSL/TLS configuration, privacy compliance, and security transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jedonneenligne.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jedonneenligne.org

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the non-profit software niche, providing integrated donation management solutions primarily for Canadian charitable organizations. Its competitive advantage lies in seamless integration with Prodon software and ease of use without programming. Revenue likely derives from SaaS subscriptions or licensing. The target customers are non-profits and donors seeking online donation solutions. The partnership with Logilys and the English version site imakeanonlinedonation.org indicate a broader ecosystem. Growth potential exists through enhanced security and privacy compliance, which are critical for donor trust. The company maintains a professional web presence but should improve technical infrastructure to support scalability and compliance.

Security posture

The current security maturity is low to moderate. While the site implements several security headers and bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to risks and undermine trust. The lack of OCSP stapling, session resumption, and certificate transparency compliance further weakens the security posture. No formal security policy or incident response contacts are published, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site requires urgent remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhanced transparency to meet modern security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable secure HTTPS connections.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Logilys Inc.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and Bootstrap for UI, Google Fonts for typography, and Font Awesome for icons. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for bot mitigation, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing. The site lacks a CMS and appears custom-built or lightly templated. Hosting is via Easydns DNS and an IP address in the 173.46.148.0/24 range. Performance metrics are missing or zero, indicating possible measurement gaps or slow loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation but could be improved with Open Graph or JSON-LD metadata. The invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical debt and risk to business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jedonneenligne.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jedonneenligne.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.