Skip to main content

Security report for jdav.de

Jugend des Deutschen Alpenvereins (JDAV) · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Jugend des Deutschen Alpenvereins (JDAV) is the youth organization of the German Alpine Club, providing educational and recreational alpine activities for children and young adults. The website serves as a portal for information on courses, events, youth politics, and sustainability initiatives, targeting youth members and interested parties within Germany. The organization operates as a non-profit entity under the larger Deutscher Alpenverein umbrella, with a medium-sized presence and recognized partnerships. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Vue.js and privacy-conscious analytics (Plausible), delivering a well-structured, mobile-optimized user experience with good SEO and accessibility standards. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements are recommended in cookie consent and security headers. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and aligned with its mission to engage youth in alpine sports and environmental stewardship.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jdav.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jdav.de

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jdav.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
50%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jdav.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JDAV holds a strong market position as a specialized youth non-profit within the alpine sports and outdoor education sector in Germany. Its business model focuses on community engagement, education, and event organization rather than commercial revenue. The organization benefits from strategic partnerships with health insurers and outdoor equipment brands, enhancing its credibility and resource base. The website supports multiple service subdomains for course and training bookings, indicating a structured operational approach. Growth potential lies in expanding digital engagement and formalizing security and privacy policies to meet evolving compliance standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. The use of a privacy-focused analytics platform reduces privacy risks. However, the absence of explicit cookie consent mechanisms and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited or lead to compliance issues. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder timely security communications. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in headers, consent management, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner and mechanism to ensure user consent for tracking.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the site against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies with dedicated contact channels to improve security transparency.
  4. Provide direct contact information such as company emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance trust and communication.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jugend des Deutschen Alpenvereins (JDAV)
Description
Die JDAV ist die Jugendorganisation des Deutschen Alpenvereins, die Angebote, Kurse, Schulungen und Veranstaltungen für Kinder und Jugendliche im Bereich Bergsport und Naturschutz bereitstellt.
Key services
Kinder- & Jugendkurse, Schulungen, Veranstaltungen, Jugendpolitik, Nachhaltigkeitsinitiativen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Plausible Analytics, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • Use of Google site verification

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German language.
  2. No direct email addresses or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact likely via internal pages.
  3. No explicit cookie consent banner or mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript framework Vue.js and privacy-focused analytics (Plausible).
  5. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, YouTube linked.
  6. Partner logos indicate collaboration with reputable organizations.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML; server headers unknown.
  8. No forms with explicit input fields detected in the main HTML content; contact forms likely on subpages.
  9. No JSON-LD structured data found in the HTML content.
  10. Open Graph and Twitter Card metadata present for social sharing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (Vue.js) with modular CSS and uses Plausible Analytics for privacy-friendly tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and responsive images. The hosting provider and server details are not disclosed in the HTML. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and cookie management to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jdav.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jdav.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.