Skip to main content

Security report for jata.app

coolLabs Technologies Bt. · Technology · Hungary

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jata.app is a minimalist todo list web application developed by coolLabs Technologies Bt., a small technology company based in Hungary. The app focuses on providing users with a simple, bloat-free interface to manage daily tasks and organize todos using hashtags. The website demonstrates a clean, modern design with good mobile optimization and fast performance, leveraging the Astro framework and custom fonts. The company maintains an active community presence on Discord and social media, enhancing user engagement and support. However, the website lacks formal privacy, cookie, and security policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but the absence of security headers and incident response information indicates room for improvement. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jata.app

This scan found 13 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
81
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, targeting general users seeking a straightforward productivity tool. Its business model appears to be SaaS or web app-based, possibly monetized indirectly through community engagement or related services. The company leverages partnerships with coolLabs.io and Coolify for merchandising and community support. The market position is niche, focusing on simplicity and minimalism in a crowded productivity app market. The presence of a sizable Discord community (12k+ members) indicates healthy user interest and potential for organic growth. No direct revenue streams or detailed business data are disclosed on the site.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a privacy-respecting analytics service (Plausible). No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface. However, the lack of security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.) and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts are gaps in security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities. Overall, security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with basic security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including an abuse or security email address, and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid potential vulnerabilities and maintain performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
coolLabs Technologies Bt.
Description
Just Another Todo App, nothing more. A simple todo list app focused on daily productivity without bloat.
Key services
Daily todo list management, Todo dumping list, Hashtag grouping for todos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Astro framework, Inter font, SVG icons, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Astro
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • No forms detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Minimalist productivity app focused on daily todo management
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Strong community presence via Discord and social media
  5. Uses modern web technologies and good performance optimizations
  6. No visible security headers detected, room for improvement
  7. No forms or data collection beyond analytics script
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Astro framework, which supports modern web development with performance optimizations. It uses the Inter font family loaded via WOFF2 for efficient typography. The site includes SVG icons and minimal JavaScript, contributing to fast load times and good mobile responsiveness. Analytics are handled by Plausible, a privacy-focused service. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. The site structure is clean with proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). No forms or complex user interactions reduce technical complexity and security risks. Overall, the technical implementation is modern, performant, and well-structured but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jata.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jata.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.