Skip to main content

Security report for jasmin.ai

Byborg IP S.a r.l. · Technology · Luxembourg

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jasmin.ai is a technology company specializing in AI-generated virtual companions, offering services such as chat, voice calls, and image sharing with AI girlfriends and characters. The platform targets adult users seeking personalized AI interactions and operates on a subscription and credit-based business model. The company is relatively new, founded in 2022, and registered in Luxembourg under Byborg IP S.a r.l. The website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity with modern frameworks like React and integration of multiple analytics and advertising pixels, indicating active marketing efforts. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent and a cookie policy, but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages were found. Overall, the site is accessible, professionally designed, and functional, but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jasmin.ai

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jasmin.ai, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
205
Employees
0
Customers
205
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
12%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jasmin.ai.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself in the niche AI companionship market with adult content focus, leveraging AI technology to create interactive virtual characters. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized AI character creation and multi-modal interaction (chat, voice, images). Revenue streams likely include subscriptions and credit purchases. The target audience is adults over 18 interested in AI companionship. The company maintains partnerships with regulatory bodies like RTA and ASACP, enhancing trust. Growth indicators include active marketing via major ad networks and continuous content updates. The business model is digital-first with no physical presence disclosed. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance compliance and security transparency to build further trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain status clientTransferProhibited, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a potential vulnerability in DNS security. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of contact information for security incidents and lack of vulnerability disclosure policy indicate gaps in security maturity. The use of multiple third-party tracking pixels raises privacy considerations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced DNS security, security headers, and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy, terms of service, and security policy pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Implement and advertise a vulnerability disclosure program and incident response contact channels.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden web security.
  5. Provide clear and verified contact information for business and security inquiries to enhance trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Byborg IP S.a r.l.
Description
Jasmin.ai offers AI-generated virtual companions that can chat, join voice calls, and share images, providing users with personalized AI girlfriends and characters.
Key services
AI character creation, Chat and voice call interactions, Image sharing with AI companions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (react-app div), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, TikTok Pixel, Twitter Ads Pixel, Reddit Ads Pixel, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Webpack
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
TikTok Ads, Twitter Ads, Reddit Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Bing Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website contains adult content with 18+ age verification notice
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  3. No explicit privacy policy page found but cookie policy is present and references privacy
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  5. Multiple tracking and advertising pixels are used
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  7. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools
  8. Domain registration is recent but consistent with business type
  9. No WAF or blocking detected, site content fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Webpack, with extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts such as Google Analytics, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. The site is mobile optimized and uses DNS prefetch and preconnect hints to improve performance. Hosting details are not explicit but domain registration is via EuroDNS S.A. The site shows moderate performance and good SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS was detected, indicating a custom-built platform. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which may impact privacy and performance, and lack of DNSSEC and security headers which could expose the site to certain attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jasmin.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jasmin.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.